Fanda Nyamo 20 gen, ore 15:08
How to describe a mission featuring the atomic bomb...
Just imagine a 1000 ingame flamethrowers, then we have it.
Ultima modifica da Fanda Nyamo; 21 gen, ore 13:17
Visualizzazione di 1-6 commenti su 6
< >
PFC Jergulson [29th ID] 20 gen, ore 22:52 
I think you are off by several orders of magnitude. Even for the small nuclear weapons of wwii :)
droggen 21 gen, ore 0:35 
Boy that would be a boring map for japan you just sit in a corner camping a door untill the allies auto win.
Crystal 21 gen, ore 1:42 
If the flamer was really how we have it in game i think weapon progress would stop and in all countries people in infantry used flamers only.
Ultima modifica da Crystal; 21 gen, ore 1:42
MeFirst 21 gen, ore 1:54 
Not really. Flamethrowers are very limited in use. In the game they are not that much limited because you are faster, the distances are shorter and you dont have to be afraid of dying because you respawn. However I dont get when people complain a lot about the flamer. Also in the game it is a 100% hit or miss weapon. Depending on the situation in the game it is the perfect or the most horrible weapon you can have in your hands.
Fanda Nyamo 21 gen, ore 9:39 
This post was just meant as a joke for a few lols.
Crystal 21 gen, ore 13:16 
Lol exactly as i said i think that flamer is much better then in real life lol.
Visualizzazione di 1-6 commenti su 6
< >
Per pagina: 15 30 50
Data di pubblicazione: 20 gen, ore 15:08
Messaggi: 6