Fanda Nyamo 20. Jan. 2014 um 15:08 Uhr
How to describe a mission featuring the atomic bomb...
Just imagine a 1000 ingame flamethrowers, then we have it.
Zuletzt bearbeitet von Fanda Nyamo; 21. Jan. 2014 um 13:17 Uhr
Beiträge 1 - 6 von 6
< >
PFC Jergulson [29ID] 20. Jan. 2014 um 22:52 Uhr 
I think you are off by several orders of magnitude. Even for the small nuclear weapons of wwii :)
droggen 21. Jan. 2014 um 0:35 Uhr 
Boy that would be a boring map for japan you just sit in a corner camping a door untill the allies auto win.
Crystal 21. Jan. 2014 um 1:42 Uhr 
If the flamer was really how we have it in game i think weapon progress would stop and in all countries people in infantry used flamers only.
Zuletzt bearbeitet von Crystal; 21. Jan. 2014 um 1:42 Uhr
MeFirst 21. Jan. 2014 um 1:54 Uhr 
Not really. Flamethrowers are very limited in use. In the game they are not that much limited because you are faster, the distances are shorter and you dont have to be afraid of dying because you respawn. However I dont get when people complain a lot about the flamer. Also in the game it is a 100% hit or miss weapon. Depending on the situation in the game it is the perfect or the most horrible weapon you can have in your hands.
Fanda Nyamo 21. Jan. 2014 um 9:39 Uhr 
This post was just meant as a joke for a few lols.
Crystal 21. Jan. 2014 um 13:16 Uhr 
Lol exactly as i said i think that flamer is much better then in real life lol.
Beiträge 1 - 6 von 6
< >
Pro Seite: 15 30 50
Geschrieben am: 20. Jan. 2014 um 15:08 Uhr
Beiträge: 6