HunterTim 03 月 6 日 @ 下午 4 時 58 分
"officer" AI
This AI shoots anyone that retreats, and yells "NOT ONE STEP BACK!"
顯示 1-10,共 10 則回應
< >
FriskyJohnson 03 月 6 日 @ 下午 6 時 19 分 
... You're a few words, quite possibly a few sentences away from this post being coherent.
Chiyomi Anzai "Anchovy" |Yuki 03 月 6 日 @ 下午 6 時 58 分 
That reminds me too much of Company of Heroes 2.
Traffic Conez 03 月 7 日 @ 下午 4 時 41 分 
I always imagined that this game needed a special class for the Soviets. A commissar where team kills are not punished...and when they do TK it inspires men to heroric feats (faster firing, increased stamina)
Crystal 03 月 8 日 @ 上午 2 時 19 分 
I hope this forum had an ai who shoots everyone who makes such stupid threads.
HunterTim 03 月 8 日 @ 上午 8 時 32 分 
3DCrystal 發表:
I hope this forum had an ai who shoots everyone who makes such stupid threads.
Order 227 search it up or read this http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/not_one_step_back.htm
I'm not just pulling these ideas out of my ♥♥♥
Crystal 03 月 8 日 @ 下午 12 時 32 分 
Dude i meant that the idea stupid for gameplay by itslef. Think before trying to teach me history of my own country.
Pistolero 03 月 8 日 @ 下午 12 時 57 分 
Actually, Hunter, you are. A couple points: A player might be moving back to an ammo dump to pick up a needed satchel charge. I've had idiots like you shoot me in the course of doing that. There might also be need to shift laterally 150 yards, and shifting down behind cover before coming back up actually makes sense; but I guess you'd be plugging those guys, too.

In real life, armies maneuver in units, stay on line, and maintain unit integrity; and still friendly fire casualties are relatively high. In real life, buddy-o, in the 'Nam even bird colonels got iced by their own guys if they were glory hounds at the cost of their men's lives. Sooner or later they had to see a medic, and a shot of air was all it took. ♥♥♥♥♥ junior officers and NCOs did not last long either. So the idea that some commissar could get away with routinely shooting his own men ain't likely. Sooner or later in most cases, one of the men would shoot him.
Crystal 03 月 8 日 @ 下午 1 時 21 分 
Btw he was dumb enough to realise that this game has such thing like combatzone.
|RD| DurbanPoison 03 月 8 日 @ 下午 1 時 38 分 
HunterTim 發表:
3DCrystal 發表:
I hope this forum had an ai who shoots everyone who makes such stupid threads.
Order 227 search it up or read this http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/not_one_step_back.htm
I'm not just pulling these ideas out of my ♥♥♥

Dont' even bother responding to little kids like Crystal - it's pointless!

I like the concept... but as long as it's NOT the AI doing the shooting! I hate being killed by bots - regardless of if it's warrented or not lol.

I think if a player (obvioulsy not marksmen or mg) camps in one spot too long or refuses to get into the cap - then yes they should be marked as traitor and the player that offs them gets +10 team points lol :)



3DCrystal 發表:
Dude i meant that the idea stupid for gameplay by itslef. Think before trying to teach me history of my own country.

I feel sorry for whatever country you represent.
最後修改者:|RD| DurbanPoison; 03 月 8 日 @ 下午 1 時 39 分
HunterTim 03 月 8 日 @ 下午 2 時 38 分 
Pistolero 發表:
Actually, Hunter, you are. A couple points: A player might be moving back to an ammo dump to pick up a needed satchel charge. I've had idiots like you shoot me in the course of doing that. There might also be need to shift laterally 150 yards, and shifting down behind cover before coming back up actually makes sense; but I guess you'd be plugging those guys, too.

In real life, armies maneuver in units, stay on line, and maintain unit integrity; and still friendly fire casualties are relatively high. In real life, buddy-o, in the 'Nam even bird colonels got iced by their own guys if they were glory hounds at the cost of their men's lives. Sooner or later they had to see a medic, and a shot of air was all it took. ♥♥♥♥♥ junior officers and NCOs did not last long either. So the idea that some commissar could get away with routinely shooting his own men ain't likely. Sooner or later in most cases, one of the men would shoot him.

you do make good points, but I personally I never shot a teammate on purpose :)
顯示 1-10,共 10 則回應
< >
每頁: 15 30 50
張貼日期: 03 月 6 日 @ 下午 4 時 58 分
回覆: 10