FoTS or Nepolionic war?
Witch one is better? I like the weaponry and strategys of the time period. So just witch ever packs the most content.
Showing 1-9 of 9 comments
< >
easytarget Mar 6, 2014 @ 4:50pm 
This is a forum dedicated to Shogun 2, so naturally I'm going to recommend FOTS.

Besides, in my opinion Napoleon was too constrained in design.
Originally posted by easytarget:
This is a forum dedicated to Shogun 2, so naturally I'm going to recommend FOTS.

Besides, in my opinion Napoleon was too constrained in design.

Thank you. Yeah I kind of wanted FoTS just because I much perfer the Japense setting then the Nepolionic one.
Alpha1-4 Mar 6, 2014 @ 6:22pm 
I love Napoleon its a great game.
ANKH Mar 6, 2014 @ 9:10pm 
FOTS battles make napoleon battles look like watching paint dry. People die so much faster, the explosions are so much more graphic and bloody than napoleon even w/ the blood and smoke mod. Naval bombarments and way better ai make this an unfair contest. I'd say FOTS
☩Daniel The Scottish☩ Mar 7, 2014 @ 1:31am 
All TTW Series are great and need buy them all with all DLC but Not ROme TOtal War 2 ... RTW 2 failed game..
PistolChimp Mar 7, 2014 @ 8:48am 
Napoleon is BECAUSE the weapons aren't as devestating. Battlelines have time to develope, and artillery, while good, isn't overpowered.
Alpha1-4 Mar 7, 2014 @ 10:17am 
Originally posted by Daniel The Scottish:
All TTW Series are great and need buy them all with all DLC but Not ROme TOtal War 2 ... RTW 2 failed game..

Yes!
Originally posted by PistolChimp:
Napoleon is BECAUSE the weapons aren't as devestating. Battlelines have time to develope, and artillery, while good, isn't overpowered.

Actually I would perfer to have much slower more realistic battles then faster more unrealstic battles. I like the idea of less people dieing because thats what would happen back then. Did you know the base casualtie numbers in battles back in the Canadian civil war where around 16 casualties per battle. Lol.
ANKH Mar 7, 2014 @ 12:44pm 
FOTS is just as realistic as Nappy TW. It's just that it took longer to load and reload in the early 1800's than the late 1800's. Also the kill range for the rifles in FOTS is like double which increases carnage DRASTICALLY yet realistically. Compare casualties in the war of 1812 to the civil war. 24,000 to 660,000

Really, if you like slower attrition combat, get napoleon. If you like carnage and blood, explosions people dropping like flies from fast reloading carbines and breech loaders, go FOTS.

Honestly I'm a fan of both, but prefer FOTS
Last edited by ANKH; Mar 7, 2014 @ 12:51pm
Showing 1-9 of 9 comments
< >
Per page: 15 30 50

Date Posted: Mar 6, 2014 @ 3:37pm
Posts: 9