Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Battlefield 3 never out sold any cod game that was released before battlefield 4.
mw3 sold more
bo2 sold more
even ghosts sold more
Also: They have 3 years for every single cod game. How much more time do you want them to have?
i own literally every title and except mw2 and mw3, they are very different from each other, and none of them are really bad. Especially treyarch titles are great games.
"Looking ahead
Activision Blizzard has a light slate of game releases planned for 2017. However, there will be a Destiny sequel, which management expects to broaden the player base. Activision also has a great opportunity in 2017 to drive higher in-game content revenue with three Call of Duty titles that each have enough of a player community for the company to benefit. Management is planning to steadily release additional in-game content for these Call of Duty games throughout the year. Because in-game content purchases carry a higher margin than game sales, 2017 could be the company's biggest year yet for digital revenue growth within Call of Duty."
Full story here -
https://www.fool.com/investing/2017/02/25/disappointing-call-of-duty-sales-shouldnt-worry-ac.aspx?yptr=yahoo
I think they should rethink how they make the games, it doesn't have to come every year, you don't have to split the player base to 2 with season pass and you dont have to offer "loot boxes" so you can squize more money. bf have a game once a few year, the game does have season pass but the devoleper support it and you can feel improvment from each game to another, that what can make a game great and that what I think cod should do.
fyi: cod is still selling way better than bf and I as a sucker almost everytime fell to the pit and buy the new cod (on sell but still) untill the IW *WHICH I WILL NEVER BUY...*
I'm with you there. What I think is tiring about COD now is this whole futuristic plot. Hopefully the next one by Treyarch (the best ones) will probably be WAW based or if they're smart enough and want to go on with Black Ops, they could do sth like Black Ops Origins or something like that. As far as the future theme goes, I think Treyarch handled it fine so far, but now it's just too much, we definitely need to go back in time. BF did it, why can't COD do the same?
actually his argument while lacking correct facts is in the right place. Games should have MORE than 3 years support. the thing is, they release a new game every YEAR. that's just bad... a truly good game should have a sequel every 3-5 years and focus on updates and maps and such. COD has gotten pretty bad in the last 6 years or so and you know it has... it's not the same game it was since at least the first Black Ops. BLOPS 3 was when the series took the worst possible turn and it hasn't improved since. It's the iphone of video games. Yes, it sells a lot of copies, doesen't mean it's a great game. McDonald's rakes in billions of dollars each year and it's not a good restuarant.
Even Black ops 2 still has support. You have no idea what you are talking about. Just because infinity ward is a very bad developer, it doesn't make the whole series bad.