Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Go away kids and let us play with decent adult games. :)
The game's somewhat more RNG heavy than most because it's a dice game. The RNG is actually part of the fun. It's basically Cthulhu Yahtzee.
The scenarios are all winnable. Ithaqua is quite obscenely difficult (mostly because you can get insta-gibbed on supplies), but beatable. It may not be to your taste since it can be a rather difficult and at times random game, but that doesn't mean there's a design error. It would be somewhat easier and probably play better if it was exact to the board game, but some liberties aren't terrible.
If you read Lovecraft or CoC and related fluff, part of the thing about the Ancient Ones is that they're basically gods. 1-4 people beating one of them should be somewhat difficult.
There are digital tabletop games that actually have problems with their pseudorandom number generators. It's really easy to mess up if you don't understand the math and just copypaste or use something from a library. I don't feel like tabulating rolls, but this doesn't seem to be one of them. It's working as designed. It's just hard.
There is skill to this game; it's the skill of knowing how to stack the odds in your favour.
I won a game on my second try.....