Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
$5 at most.
The 3DS has some fantastic games you can spend your money on. This isn't one of them.
You sound like a kid who has his parents buy you games so you don't know true value if it hit you.
21? Developing games for 7 years? Making games at 14 and you're telling me THIS game is worth every one of those 4000 pennies.
Nah. Even if someone was to pawn this game off to me for 5 dollars, I wouldn't want it. Gauntlet on NES is basically this game, and infinitely better. And it was made YEARS before this.
Gauntlet was a fun game, yes. with similar gameplay? yes.
now tell me why did you enjoy that game in itself?
Music. Difficulty. Puzzles. Co-op. Among other things.
All of which this game lack.
Now you're probably going "This game has cooP!' No, no it doesn't. A game that costs 40 dollars and in the 2013 has no reason now to have online. Gauntlet on NES had co-op of ITS TIME, this game, does not.
ok. hate to tell you,
this game has all of that.
(Less puzzles tho) true it desperately needs online, but the game is designed to play like an older retro game. why? because that was the vision for the game. It was made to emulate the feel of an old time game with a newer franchise. Should it be worth $40? as much as it should be worth $5. the game wasn't designed to be the greatest most cutting edge experinece, that doesn't mean you should throw away it's design and final concept away. if your so anal about playing with friends, invite friends over. it might not strike you as best of 2013, but it still a decent game. the game has decent music, increasing difficulty, moderate amount of puzzles, and basic level Co-op. if it had online it'll still be the same Co-op, just over the internet. I want online, i'll wait for it. however I don't need to throw my computer out a window, whining about how i didn't properly reseach the game before buying, to realize if I,myself, would be willing to buy a game of this caliber for the listed price. the game won't stay 40 bucks forever. eventually it'll probably be 15 bucks, but if you think that $5 is a decent price and any network selling it would agree with you, your dreaming.
Why in the hell are you defending this obvious attempt at fanbase milking?
You've been milked for your money for all you're worth. Accept the facts.
`````We might have different opinions, but that was no reason to offend you. I wanted to apologize for insulting you. Just because I provoked by that spoiled child statement does not give me the right to judge your perception of the game and point of view. I'm sorry. I'd rather not abuse something as awesome as steam for problems. Sorry for the problem.