安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
If you give sick family members medicine AND take care of the problem that caused them to be sick in the first place, they will get better. What this means is that if they got sick from being hungry, but the heat was on, then you can give them food and medicine and turn the heat off and they will still recover. Ditto for getting sick from cold, and turning the heat on and giving medicine but not feeding them.
You really can't get away with letting your family go hungry or cold for more than a day without getting sick, and your son will often still get sick from just a day without food. The practical way to save money from the very beginning is to alternate food days and heat days, applying medicine every day a family member is sick. Even if your son gets sick every day, you will still save money over paying for both food and heat every day, and nobody will die since they don't go without either resource for more than a day.
It's hard to figure out what "common sense" is in faux 20th century Soviet Satellite Country.
You can't get the ending with (SPOILER ALERT)
your whole family escaping to Obristan, but it's a good strategy for getting some achievements, such as the Class-5 apartment since upkeep is less expensive (though I did it with all family alive including the niece). If you're having trouble with your money it's a good idea. Otherwise no. Though (again, SPOILER ALERT)
there is a bad ending where you let all your family die, so if you want all the endings it does get you that.