Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Yours is not to ask why. You are from a Soviet-expy country. If the records don't match, you reject their entry. If you don't like it, You. Can. Be. Replaced.
This. If there are unproven discrepencies, reject the passport. One thing I used to do wrong was I'd fingerprint them and see that it matches the record, but missed seeing that the person had no known aliases, so the name on the document was still invalid.
On this topic though: right after posting that, I read another thread (or maybe it was a guide) on this subject and learned a few more efficiency measures: apparently even after the reason stamp is in play, you can still skip fingerprinting and scanning. You have to question them, but you apparently do NOT have to actually hit the fingerprint or search button. Instead you just hit the blue and red stamps and be done with it. I tried it a couple times and it seems to work just fine... the only reason not to seems to be if you WANT to detain people (which has its plusses and minuses...)
I think you're correct on this. My thinking was, the photo doesn't match but the fingerprints prove it's them - in that case yeah their documents have an old photo but they are clearly the entrant's documents. In other words, I thought our job was to verify their identity (and intent) - but really our job is to verify their documents. An old photo IS grounds for rejection from the country. Harsh yo.
If you're being cited for fingerprints that match, there is some other discrepancy, make sure to scan them if the height/weight is off, or check for different spellings of the name in the documents.
I'm also a she.
Also, in response to partlyhuman who said "An old photo IS grounds for rejection." Well... yes and no. If you question them and finger print them, you can't still reject them if the fingerprinting verifies them. But if you don't bother to check that far, you can get away with it. :) It's more than an old (or rather, non-matching) photo provides you with an easy loophole for rejecting them than that it is an actual, official rule that allows rejection.
That's exactly what I meant, if the fingerprints match it shows the difference of the photo doesn't matter; i.e. they are who they say they are. I guess it was worded strangely, since you have to show the discrepancy before checking for fingerprints. :P
And sorry Cabbit, didn't do a background check before posting.