Legends of Dawn

Legends of Dawn

View Stats:
Nijuu Nov 4, 2013 @ 10:43pm
Hows the game been since all the patches?
Hey all,
Havent played for a while, but wondering what the game is like after all the patching thats been done?. Good? Bad?.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 15 comments
saltmummy626 Nov 5, 2013 @ 12:21pm 
well... it doesnt eat up as much system memory. thats good I guess, its still not very good though. its better, but better doesnt make it good. its in the grey so to speak. I recomend waiting some more.
think of the most promissing game you can think of with the most worse outcome and your in the Ring! So said by a former white knight and fanboy sorry .
Last edited by -Silver the Dragon-; Nov 6, 2013 @ 7:47am
Rzep Nov 6, 2013 @ 12:39pm 
I just got the game and the performance is really bad and my PC runs BF4 on Ultra.
Shamanec 巫女 Nov 6, 2013 @ 4:28pm 
Sure it does, and with over 60 Fps right :D

Takedown! Takedown!
Everyone's trying to escape Arkania alive!
Takedown! Takedown!
Red Sabre!
Teiji Nov 6, 2013 @ 11:38pm 
Lol well any pc can run BF4 on ultra, the thing is, how good it runs it rofl. Anyways the game seems to be doing better but not by much. I played it on my friends account when it came out and other than random crashes the game felt clunky (it's not that great in terms graphics but it just felt choppy), now it feels smoother but like others have said, it isn't a big of an improvement.
Rzep Nov 7, 2013 @ 3:11am 
Any ideas what options may be causing the choppiness?
I've played it for a little over an hour - I haven't experienced any performance issues. The game play is quite decent so far (you have to use WASD because mouse movement is half♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ and I would say this is definitely more professional and futher along than Realm Of Arkania: Blade of Darkness.

Here's my specs:

Operating System
Windows 8.1 Pro 32-bit
Intel Pentium G645 @ 2.90GHz
Sandy Bridge 32nm Technology
4.00GB Dual-Channel DDR3 @ 666MHz (9-9-9-24)
Generic PnP Monitor (1440x900@60Hz)
2048MB ATI AMD Radeon HD 6670 (Sapphire/PCPartner)

I have all of the settings pretty much maxed as well with exception of shadows only on objects, set at meidum, and Antialiasing and Antistropic Filtering turned down 2x's (you never really need those two nowadays anyways).

Aside from fixing the strange mouse-movement issue the only other thing during my hour of play that kinda sucked was the minimap not making note Active quests. I had to keep the Map panel open while playing to see which way I was heading and the Map panel takes up half of the screen (but you can repsosition it).

Oh, one other thing that was weird is that your characters can start walking up on rocks and get himself stuck in odd places - one time the only way to set myself free was to wiggle into the water and if you're in the water too long trying to find surface to come back out on you wind up drowning.
Last edited by The Good Slaveship "Lollipop"; Nov 7, 2013 @ 5:40am
saltmummy626 Nov 7, 2013 @ 9:37am 
I had some trouble getting stuck too. had to complete reload my game. the fifth time it happened, the game crashed and corrupted the save. my biggest problem with the game isnt its weird graphical issues. its primarily memory consumption, which is considerable on low end machines and laptops and causes over heating, and the poorly designed game features/NPCs. one of the selling points for the game was the sheer number of NPCs, but most of them have nothin to say. at all. in fact if it werent for the NPCs, useless treasure, and fact that NPCs dont have any pride of ownership and thus wont stop you from ransacking their homes from top to bottom, this game would be alright.

I didnt know you could drown, but it does explain why I died while going through my inventory in the middle of that pool of water that one time...
Originally posted by saltmummy626:
its primarily memory consumption, which is considerable on low end machines and laptops and causes over heating,

Yeah, I think this is primarily the main reason I have not been having as many performance issues as many have had over the past year in quite a few games - I'm playing on a desktop which offers more space for meatier graphics cards requiring fans.
xsys Nov 9, 2013 @ 7:29am 
Something is terribly un-optimized though. I can run current AAA games like Batman Origins, Tomb Raider, Skyrim, etc. all at high settings with 50-60 fps and no stuttering. This game is dropping into the 20s for no apparent reason, and it doesn't seem to matter what settings I have.

Win7 x64, NVidia 560ti, AMD 8 core cpu, 8 gig dual-chan mem
xsys Nov 9, 2013 @ 10:02am 
I did some tweaking in the NVidia panel and things are running quite good now. I think it was overriding the AA and vertical sync that did it. However, the game crashes on exit now...suppose I can live with that if the game looks and runs better.

I think the game just needs a little bit more work to make it a very good game, but it is playable (and enjoyable) as is. Of course I am coming in at patch 1.07, so I can only imagine what it was like at 1.0!
Last edited by xsys; Nov 9, 2013 @ 10:02am
it started in february and even the game is out now the pledgers dosent got there promissed stuff like the digital map , music , dwarven chronicles . who ever has done that to its best customers havin the currage to say we will do it later and later and later and later almost noone plays the game and the promissed stuff is still not with the pledgers thats ridiculous no its scandalous and its bad manners all in all a spit in the face of the community its time to say this open as i was months a calmer waiting nicely thankin devs for there patches but now again 3 months ago was the next patch promissed and not done it should have included the long needed pledgestuff and fixes but again no communication or very very rarely a word im honest
i never ever experienced such ignorance towards the playerbase and im 58 so to say yes not native english speakin writing . The game has still a terrible Fov what i citisised since months.
saltmummy626 Nov 9, 2013 @ 4:20pm 
"everything lawson grey death said"

they are too busy making DLC and a sequal to deliver on their promises. too bad. ive seen big budget companies that behave worse, but ive seen them behave better too. the only thing I can say, is that at least its not "the war z."
Numb-Tung Nov 22, 2013 @ 6:35pm 
Originally posted by saltmummy626:
well... it doesnt eat up as much system memory. thats good I guess, its still not very good though. its better, but better doesnt make it good. its in the grey so to speak. I recomend waiting some more.

I have this on my wishlist..I'll wait till things are sorted..thanks for you're honest post M8

< >
Showing 1-15 of 15 comments
Per page: 15 30 50