安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
I like how you hop around the good points that he made.
It got a low score due to lack of animation, and a forced boring and broken gambling system.
The game was made for fans (like me) and fanboys (like you), it's not going to appeal to a much broader audience no matter how much you want it to, even people who love modern adventure games would agree with the arguments he made. But instead of accepting the review for what it is, you fanboys take it personally and insist that the review is invalid, and the reviewer only plays Call of Duty etc.
The only thing that makes me question the review at all, is that like many other reviewer, he doesn't mention the music at all, which was one of the obvious high points of the game.