Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If anything, it has a pair of speedrun achievements. I don't do speedruns so I didn't do them, though.
But the main point of the game is its thorough mockery of DLCs. And I think it does it well.
Yeah, I don't always predict a game's length by its price. Now that I've completed it I just wish it had 3 or 4 more campaigns. It was simply awesome.
Achievements aren't just for E-peen, in many cases they flesh out more of the game that you wouldn't get to experience normally.
Or simply provide a greater challenge if you felt you didn't get enough of it.
Some games take it too far with arbitrary achievements like "die 1000 times" or "Collect 10,000 X", I condemn these games, but other than that you're really missing out a greater experience by just playing from point A to point B.
I kind of agree with this. I always check out the achievements in a game, after I finish the campaign, but some of the are simply dumb! I like achievements that challenge you, but I like it when it's normal. "Play again x level using only y" is normal for me, but "Beat the game over again without dying" is a worthless achievement.
I always want to take the best out of a game, but not all games have something more to give you after you finish the campaign. And it's not easy to figure out if it does or not.
(Sorry if I don't make sense. It's 00:59 and I'm drunk. Or I think I am)
also dont think length of game makes or breaks it. but it does have at least some relation to its asking price. if a 60 dollar triple A was only 2 hours, i would feel ripped off even if it were high quality. i wouldnt feel a 15 dollar indie is "worth it" just because it 50 hours but crappy.
(wow im rambling)
if time is the only metric :) and a 60 dollar AAA is considered fair or nomal at 20 hours average, thats 60/20=3 per hour.
or in other words, if on average, DLC quest is 2 hours, then 6 dollars would still be fair.
or to put it the other way, at its 1 dollar sale price, 20 minutes would be fair. (if its quality)
trust me. DLC quest left me wanting more as well. not because i felt ripped off in any way (nor did the OP say he was ripped off either) but rather, i just enjoyed and honestly want more. id be willing to pay for more should they come out with a sequal.
it would be funny if the came out with a DLC.