Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
1. due to fact that Kingdom and Empire can recruite different heroes,
2. due to the different classes and other abilities.
3. due to the different worlds and monsters.
4. due to the different ways to win the party, etc etc :^)
However, I am curious, how would you score it?
What would you give points for?
If I won a game with a single city does that mean I did worse or better than if I won with twenty cities?
I'd love to know your thoughts.
But in complex games, I do think scoring is the issue - how would you score it? A point for every enemy killed?
The game already has a end game score/rank system where it compares your efforts to one of the games story characters.
If that information could be saved & ranked that would be fine.
The Civilization series has done a wonduful job with turn-based end game results
My bad.
Well, there you go, I suppose if you wanted to you could start a forum thread and post your gametype and score. Maybe a screenshot or two. Then see if anyone else beats you for it.
Ooor, start a thread with a game type, conditions, factions in the game, difficulty level then challege others to play with the same settings then post a score after a week?
I know, low tech and not automated but if there is interest I imagine some people respond at which point you could bring the case forward.
I believe what you just described was being done a while back, not sure if it was here or on the stardock forums though.