It's unreal (and kind of sad) that people are buying this 'game'...

[SOAPMAK3R]

If you buy this game, the message you are sending out to horrible game devs everywhere is,

"We are idiots, and we will buy anything, as long as it is hyped up with lies, even in the face of overwhelming negative feedback from the press, critics and gamers."

This is exactly why companies like Capcom, EA, and Activision get away with taking the piss using (on-disc/day 1) DLC and every anti-consumer practise in the book.

I don't blame Valve or Steam for allowing this game on Steam, I blame the consumers for not having enough sense not to buy it, or having more money than sense.

Time to wake up kids, you are being exploited, ruthlessly, and then you are aggressively defending your exploiters. That is some weird form of Stockholm syndrome.

[SOAPMAK3R]

Speak for yourself ;) :P

[SOAPMAK3R]

It's free if you don't need any of the features that come with the paid version, of which there are many, and in the sale of one print, of one painting that I made with it, it has already paid for itself many times over. ;)

[bruce]

just an opinion

[Artur Sutley and Friends]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย SOAPMAK3R:

I don't blame Valve or Steam for allowing this game on Steam...

You should.

And you should stop brownnosing Steam/Valve and realize that all they care about is your money. They wouldn't have allowed this trainwreck of a game back onto Steam if they gave an ounce of care about its consumer base.

I think you're one of the people who suffers from this strange form of Stockholm Syndrome as well, but that's just my opinion. :)

[니쎄]

new call of dutys & resident evils spring to mind when reading this... :P

[SOAPMAK3R]

I'm not 'brown nosing' anyone. Business' exist to make money!? Who would have thought??

There are plenty of crap games on Steam. No one is forcing me to buy them. Steam provides a service, and I choose what I want to spend my money on.

If I choose to spend money on a product that is either terrible, or maybe I just end up not liking it, is that Steam/Valves' fault? Nope. It's totally my fault for not doing a bit of casual research into the product.

[CarolDesu]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย SOAPMAK3R:

I'm not 'brown nosing' anyone. Business' exist to make money!? Who would have thought??

There are plenty of crap games on Steam. No one is forcing me to buy them. Steam provides a service, and I choose what I want to spend my money on.

If I choose to spend money on a product that is either terrible, or maybe I just end up not liking it, is that Steam/Valves' fault? Nope. It's totally my fault for not doing a bit of casual research into the product.

It is VALVES fault for not quality testing etc if it is on steam it should be good.

[니쎄]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย epicsbs:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย SOAPMAK3R:

I'm not 'brown nosing' anyone. Business' exist to make money!? Who would have thought??

There are plenty of crap games on Steam. No one is forcing me to buy them. Steam provides a service, and I choose what I want to spend my money on.

If I choose to spend money on a product that is either terrible, or maybe I just end up not liking it, is that Steam/Valves' fault? Nope. It's totally my fault for not doing a bit of casual research into the product.

It is VALVES fault for not quality testing etc if it is on steam it should be good.

No it isn't...a products quality isn't Valves responsability. It's your job to find out if you will like the product or not. So do some research before buying or stop complaining.
Unless ofcourse Valve have made the product themselves.

[I BLESS THE RAINS DOWN IN AFRICA]

it is sad valve after knowing how people feel about the game and knowing that last time it was on the store people were being lied too they decide to bring it back that is more sad to me then morons making moronic purchases.

[니쎄]

Beeing a "bad" game doesn't mean Valve have to do anything about it, unless they made the thing themselves. Seeing a game as "bad" or "good" is different for every single one of us. It's only if false advertising is in play that it's Valves responsability to make sure this does not happen. Meaning if a game says you will be able to fly and puke rainbows and then nothing of the sort is actually in the game, then it's Valves responsability to say "oi, ♥♥♥♥♥ mate?" and remove the thing or make sure the developer changes the "lies" or gtfo of steam.

[mr bigdad]

Valve should be held responsible for this kindof crap on STEAM!

[BONDUELLE]

For that price (which is still low) I had a lot of fun with my friends and I still play this game a lot. I just don't visit 10 forums to flame how devs are bad. Don't you have any other important things in your life so you have to flame everywhere? Did devs hurt you so bad with this "false advertisement"? Are you retarded and you buy everything without reading opinions, checking streams or watching videos? Stay idiot, I bought not finished game and I have fun.

[-GG- jonny blaze]

i loved steam for pulling it the first time as it needed to be done and was the right thing to do. but bringing it back ? what are they smoking

[James]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย wirher:

For that price (which is still low) I had a lot of fun with my friends and I still play this game a lot. I just don't visit 10 forums to flame how devs are bad. Don't you have any other important things in your life so you have to flame everywhere?

Steam brought the game back to make sure these people's lives still have meaning. If the War Z disappears... where will they go? What will they do?

[Crix]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Bruce:

just an opinion

Not an opinion when the arugements brought against it are justafiable and are accurate.