Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
lol.....
tools will be tools.....even if you slap them in the face with facts until their skin turns red. They will grasp at 'justification/denial straws' with Gusto !!!! ;)
lol...."originally the buyers fault"....haha.....
23
;)
with a 1.3 user score....heh.
and Gamespot is rating 2.0 atm
Past gaming - Who has the most skill.
Future gaming - Who payed the most for their hacks.
It's getting sweeter :D
fanboy living in denial....took it up the dumper dry.. the developer team is trying?...ya to get the most money out of people that they can...pathetic!
game update!...well...uhh, we updated ingame graphics from 8 to 16 bit, but all the cheaters and hackers...well, we will allow them to continue playing and ban all the decent players....cause, well....a good portion of our fanboy base is made of cheaters....so we want to keep them around.......ya......thats it...
The buyers fault?
The buyers fault...
Jesus, you should seriously sterilize yourself.
Yep.
You obviously have no freaking idea what you're talking about. Metacritic scores are based on ratings submitted by the media from all over the world. It's also based on reviews submitted by consumers. So please...enlighten us as to how Metacritic takes bribes, and how those bribes impact the reviews scores submitted by people that don't work for them? Jackass...
I like Metacritic because it takes the average of the game reviewer reviews. Some reviewers give unfair reviews because of a bad experience, others give glowing reviews to obviously sub-par games. The average usually gets it right.
With the case of "The War Z", which is grammatically as horrific as a real zombie plague, 11 reviewers unanimously said this game sucks big hairy goat testicles. Having played it, I agree.