Инсталирайте Steam
вход
|
език
Опростен китайски (简体中文)
Традиционен китайски (繁體中文)
Японски (日本語)
Корейски (한국어)
Тайландски (ไทย)
Чешки (Čeština)
Датски (Dansk)
Немски (Deutsch)
Английски (English)
Испански — Испания (Español — España)
Испански — Латинска Америка (Español — Latinoamérica)
Гръцки (Ελληνικά)
Френски (Français)
Италиански (Italiano)
Индонезийски (Bahasa Indonesia)
Унгарски (Magyar)
Холандски (Nederlands)
Норвежки (Norsk)
Полски (Polski)
Португалски (Português)
Бразилски португалски (Português — Brasil)
Румънски (Română)
Руски (Русский)
Финландски (Suomi)
Шведски (Svenska)
Турски (Türkçe)
Виетнамски (Tiếng Việt)
Украински (Українська)
Докладване на проблем с превода
Which is why I didn't bother concerning myself with commentating on all the nummerous different things Hammerpoint did to the game. I stand by my point: the game itself can be fun now when it may or may not have been fixed but I am no interested in the game for Hammerpoint is a couple of corrupt bastards who puts a stain on the gaming community and more precisely, to developers of games.
WarZ being a cashgrab - yes, of course I know this but it ain't the biggest problem; its "just" an annoyence upon all the other stuff WarZ was/is of today! ... an example of a cashgrab done right is actually a game like LoL.
It used the hype of DotA now becoming its own standalone game and all and because of the timing it was clearly a cashgrab. The difference is that it was also a game which actually worked and just keeps building of today. "Cashgrabbing" in this case however, is a different tale as they did - as you are well aware obviously - an unfinnished or at least awful game to the press who did their job and told us to avoid it like the plauge!
But all games have to make a profit so essentially all games are cashgrabs, the difference is how you use the word "cashgrab" and if the game in question is a good one or bad.
But as I said in my previous comment I don't believe the problem was that this is a cashgrab it is one but the problem is with the developers now being one of the worst if not actually THE worst game developers out there of today!
I know it used the DayZ hype as a tool to make money but even if a game improves just a little bit, just imagine DayZ but with good zombie AI and stable servers. Then the game would be amazingly much better of today but, as I said before - I don't care if the game is better which is why WarZ won't ever be a likeable game; no matter its origins, no matter how many patches there are ... only one thing might be able to save WarZ but no one would ever make this happen: a change of developers! And if that ever happens I am going to smile all the way to China, but if you are a realist one will know that it won't happen.
Wait... are there non-cashgrab games? like... non-profits that make games? I thought basically all games were for profit.
I think the game is worth the 15€ it costs. There are few games that give me adrenaline during a shoot-out - WarZ is one of them.
Is that adrenaline worth risking your future payments used to purchase WarZ consider you as an untrustworthy person? It has happend and this is the reason I don't want anyone to recommend a game which have folks who have gone out thier way to do something like that.
Is that adrenaline from the game, or clicking the button "Confirm purchase"?
If one wants adrenaline, buy a horror game! Not a game that have had this much, and I will repeat myself for a third time now; controversy regarding the launch - to such a degree that it falls down the same route as Greenpeace.
This is a good example to explain althu' I do know that Greenpeace is a global organisation to help animal's rights around the globe (in case someone who skims too much might read this and realize, "hey, maybe I should read the whole text"; not refering to anyone directly with this statement): a represenative from Greenpeace visited me last summer, wanting me to sign a petition - I asked them this question:
"But isn't Greenpeace the organisation who blows up whale-catchers out to the sea?" and recived this as an answer, "A small group, a tiny group of people who call themself come from Greenpeace have done this yes but the organisation is in reality a large support of research and medical aid and more than that, its just a small group of people who actually come from Greenpeace who does this, maybe like 1% - but with all the people who does this it could very much be 10%. Still, a small number for such a large organisation!"...
Here lies the problem why a certain selective few games/developers/associates shouldn't ever be trusted or have thier product recommended. The reason why is because even if it is just the "10%", it is still the most obvious and most representive of the actual group!
And I say the same thing with this game that I say with Greenpeace for both Greenpeace and Hammerpoint have lost all possible creditbility even if it is "just those 10%", it is still what is a huge mark upon them and thier product: make over, make good - aka. recreate "Hammerpoint" with a new studio (aka. change studio) for Hammerpoint will always be repsonsiable for all the controversy that were associated with the launch of WarZ.
This is the ONLY way WarZ will ever be worth a single penny...
For sure, Hammerpoint just might turn around and redo everything but the problem still remains! They are still associated with the controversy, and associated with WarZ - these two connect rather nicely.
Stop recommending a broken game, maybe not in its current form but with all of it which is associated with WarZ - it will NEVER, and I repeat: NEVER be worth as much as anything else than a thought that you cast away for you don't want to be involved, helping or in some way be part of Hammerpoint.