Installer Steam
Logg inn
|
språk
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (tradisjonell kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tsjekkisk)
Dansk (dansk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spania)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latin-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (gresk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (nederlandsk)
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasil)
Română (rumensk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et problem med oversettelse
Diskusjonsregler og retningslinjer
Rapporter dette innlegget
Bottom line is I would luv a proper/big name company to make a game like this but I guess no1 will until the new consoles are out and if they can handle something like this game, then it will be profitable enough for them to bother making one.
This also explains the newer threads about: "I just bought the game but can't access it boo-hoo"
Long answer: Experiencing the thrilling hunt of gathering friends and fighting for survival in a, more or less, wasteland is one of the biggest reasons people play this game. Let us not forget that gathering weapons and bartering with other survivors is also a huge point for this game. Attacking outposts and taking over hotspots with several clan members is a really adventures experience.
Hopefully I have made some points on why people buy this game and play it.
What happened to honor and ethics?
The game is not the major issue, it's a typical low end PVP. Nothing new, above average, or cutting edge about it.
The larger issue is how can people support the behavior of the devs? By giving them money you are reinforcing that people can act without honor, treat people badly, and lie with impunity.
You all only have yourselves to blame when other unscrupulous people see how easy it is to put a minimum effort and rake in the money. We will see more of these "foundation games" with more attention giving to the in game stores and less attention given to things like plot, functionality, design, and art.
You have shown the other sharks out there that you are willing to overlook scummy behavior if they give you the minimum of effort then spin promises and false hope. They will bleed your wallets to finance their Beverly Hills/Rodeo Drive lives.
Morals and ethics should not change because it's "only 15$". This behavior is inexcusable even if the game was free-to-play, and by purchasing it you are saying:
"Yup, this is exactly how I would act. I have no problem with it".
Is that really how you want others to see you? Is that really what you want to see when you look in the mirror?
at least now they are in some kind of a betatest phase and their testers paid for the participation - I guess they learned this from Blizzard
they should have got a more secure network first...
Shouldn't this tell you how biased and moronic metascores can be? Informed people will look at the gameplay videos, and if it looks enjoyable, buy it. Anyone who bases their purchase on a metascore is the one without brains.
Fact of the matter is, Day Z: SA is not out yet and Arma II's controls and UI blow ♥♥♥♥ when compared to War Z's in terms of familiarity and simplicity. People want a first-person shooter style zombie game, not a tactical simulation and I think people's wallets have spoken extremely clear in that respect.
Is that why Arma 2 is out selling WarZ right now? And don't say it is selling better because people want to play Arma2 and not DayZ because the Arma 2 with expansion has it listed on their page with DayZ.
I'm not really sure why it is the consumer's job to enforce the law... you'd think we'd have some institutions for this. I have never once done a thourough background check on a film I was about to see to make sure it didn't harm animals, mistreat its workers, had proper licensing for all the music and other works contained within it, made sure each actor was morally acceptable to support the career of, etc etc etc.
*facepalms* Do you realize most of the movies produced don't make it to the "big screen?"
There are production companies who don't treat their artists or crew well or withhold back end payments for completed projects, who crunch the numbers in such a way that the residuals never get paid to certain sectors.
The great part about this case is that the research had already been done for people and was being shouted from the rooftops. Even the 20-23 metacritic score should have triggered a "Hey lets look at the forums and see what THAT'S all about".
It's akin to someone yelling "Don't go in that cave! There's an angry bloodthirsty bear in it!" and yelling back at them "I don't believe you, I should see for myself".
Later at the hospital, you really shouldn't blame that bystander for your missing arm.