Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (испанский Лат. Ам.)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
Yes... But I don't think the Type 97 sniper rifle would add a lot to the balance... The flash might be small- but victims of snipers attacks often lived to talk about it. It was that weak. Pulling off headshots should be very difficult.
Less Type 100's SMG's were produced than that, yet it's in the game. The Type 96 and 99 light machine guns are almost identical... The Type 11 would be the best answer.
I think it is all that evil "game balance" stuff at work. OR tripwire has never actually read any Army's manuals of how to make a fighting position. But it is a slippery slop. How do you make a game accessable to main stream COD/BF guys while attempting something a little more real? There forumla is generally fun and better IMO than the bigger guys. BUT do not fool yourself into thinking realistic.
Legit field of fire defensive positions with interlocking fire and all that may be to much for COD Joe to handle. My thinking is that so many do not work together anyways that an attacking team could fine weak points to exploit as so many go off and run around with their heads cut off. But certainly no clearing out a bunker sort of thing here.