Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Insurgency games are faster, more CQB and offer gameplay for SOLO players.
Squad live and die on Squad Leaders. Gameplay is very teambased and class are fully unlocked in full teams, maps are huge in comparison, vehicular combat and transportation, base building, fortifications, 2 hour long match, etc.
You can win games through pure skill - though if the other team are communicating then you cannot do anything against two people coming round seperate corners at the exact same itme.
Squad is more drawn out however - and a lot less hardcore I'd say.
It's kind of like a mix between BF, Arma and Insurgency... If you catch my drift.
Both have different gameplay, unless you want more tactical, go for squad.