Wargame: AirLand Battle > 一般的な話題 > トピックの詳細
Chestus 1月10日 12時26分
lesser units
so the last few days i have been reading the eugen forum and i find a lot of articles about for example leopard tanks. and it made me really wonder why units that are made by the major countries and in their decks(like the leopard in a german deck) are better then when you drive around with your Canadian leopard??? its the same tank but somehow there is armor missing and they lost the targeting system??? or east german T72 is worse then a russian one????
iz bizar ain it as a country i wouldn't buy the second choice tank and give them the finger.....
1-11 / 11 のコメントを表示
< >
Pyrophosphate 1月10日 12時41分 
The USSR especially did not sell or give away their full models. For example, in the Gulf War, Saddam had, at absolute best, T-72Ms. If you look in the game (I believe the Czechs have them), they're quite a bit worse than any real T-72. T-72Ms had lower quality armor, lower build quality in general, and none of the advanced optics the Soviet models had. They also lacked the ability to fire ATGMs from the barrel.

I don't know if or how often the same sort of thing happened on the NATO side.
Chestus 1月10日 12時44分 
but thats like buying second choice lighters from china or not, if you look at the leopard i think its the same. i don't think the german same class leopard is as bad as the norwegian or canadian leo's
Chestus 1月10日 12時45分 
and selling them to a saddam like character i can understand but when you fight in the same war and are in the same pact its a bit silly or not???
Compassghost 1月10日 13時28分 
Canadian Leopards were export purchases from Germany. Since Canada was not under any major land threat during the Cold War being in North America and all, they did not have to have the best of the best tanks when an okay tank could do.
Chestus 1月10日 13時37分 
what a load of bullcrap. its a game and units should be universal sorry for my french but yes rubbish
Kraft 1月10日 15時27分 
Chestus の投稿を引用:
sorry for my french
Don't worry.
最近の変更はKraftが行いました; 1月10日 15時27分
captgeo 1月10日 17時27分 
the Can Leo is the same Leo the Germans had, there was no difference at all in real life
Mittens 1月11日 4時26分 
Chestus の投稿を引用:
what a load of bullcrap. its a game and units should be universal sorry for my french but yes rubbish

No the game is made to be semi-realilistic. If a nation did not have a specific unit, they don't have it in the game. If they had a lesser unit, they have a lesser unit in the game. With tanks for example, you could buy older tanks, or tanks that lacked current gen optics, stabalizers, turret rotation equipment etc at a lower price, and many nations did. Also many nations dont sell the best of what they have.
L3wt 1月11日 8時56分 
the export leopards were either all a1 or a3 models. Norwegian one is probably the best one out of them. None of them were upgraded untill 89. Norway and denmark will most likely get the LEO 1A5NO/DK in Red Dragon and canada the C1 MEXAS.
BlackAlpha 1月11日 9時35分 
The Canadian Leopard C1 is better than the German Leopard 1A4 - better armor, better AP, more ammo, better stabilizer, but worse optics (which is no big deal if you have recon). So what's the problem? The Canadian one is overpowered?

Keep in mind that this is still a game, not a simulation. Things are balanced for gameplay purposes.
最近の変更はBlackAlphaが行いました; 1月11日 9時37分
Chestus 1月11日 11時10分 
i only took the can leo as an example
1-11 / 11 のコメントを表示
< >
ページ毎: 15 30 50
投稿日: 1月10日 12時26分
投稿数: 11