Uberch01 2014년 2월 15일 오후 6시 43분
WMD's?
what would you do if if the Next wargame ( after red dragon) they added WMD's to the game( tactical nukes, gass, etc.) and how would they even make it so it would be fair.
Uberch01님이 마지막으로 수정; 2014년 2월 15일 오후 6시 44분
23개 중 1-15 표시중
< >
Arrow 2014년 2월 15일 오후 10시 27분 
Fairly certain that strategic weapons are out - this is more tactics than anything else. They would sooner add aircraft carriers and AEW&C planes than WMDs.
Arrow님이 마지막으로 수정; 2014년 2월 15일 오후 10시 27분
orcbuster 2014년 2월 16일 오전 1시 48분 
devs have confirmed that WMDs will never be addednon the tactical map. they are already included on the strategic campaign map.
corpsman-up 2014년 2월 16일 오전 8시 38분 
WMD's like Tactical Nukes aren't realistically ever going to be used on the scale of the Tactical Map (Strategic Map, yes, but I believe the devs want to show what the war would be like had no Nukes been fired. Straight up conventional war).
Uberch01 2014년 2월 17일 오전 4시 46분 
that allready being said it would a whole other factor to the game that could be good or bad and if the devs won't add it there is bound to b a mod out there.
Uberch01님이 마지막으로 수정; 2014년 2월 18일 오후 4시 15분
julian554327 2014년 2월 17일 오전 6시 53분 
*Uses tactical nuke on AI in a sector in campaign: gets entire force wiped out by counter nukes* pretty much what would happen
Uberch01 2014년 2월 18일 오후 4시 18분 
julian554327님이 먼저 게시:
*Uses tactical nuke on AI in a sector in campaign: gets entire force wiped out by counter nukes* pretty much what would happen

there would be anti-nukes and CNB protection on the more expensive vehicles and it would make armored CV's more usefull then they are now.
Magic Striz 2014년 2월 19일 오전 4시 42분 
Armored CV's are useful in conquest when conquering forward, contested sectors. I only use armored CV's and Tank CVs.
Uberch01 2014년 2월 19일 오후 4시 12분 
I said more usefull , Armed CV's saved my ♥♥♥ lots of times
Chestus 2014년 2월 20일 오전 11시 28분 
daisycutter would be nice, a hercules 130 would fly as fast as an A10
Uberch01 2014년 2월 20일 오후 5시 31분 
the bigger the better
[88thIR]FylkirOdinsson 2014년 2월 25일 오후 10시 52분 
I wouldn't mind to see carpet bombing with B-52s or Tupelovs. Hell what I'd really like to see is actual airborne infantry, parachute out of planes onto a battlefield.
Uberch01 2014년 3월 1일 오전 11시 16분 
yea and it would work because it would be obvoise but faster then unloading by helocopter
corpsman-up 2014년 3월 1일 오후 4시 32분 
GCG Fylkir Panzerlied님이 먼저 게시:
I wouldn't mind to see carpet bombing with B-52s or Tupelovs. Hell what I'd really like to see is actual airborne infantry, parachute out of planes onto a battlefield.

This can't happen. If you know anything about Airborne operations, every single attempt to paradrop infantry directly into an engagement has been a failure (even Normandy, but that suceeded because of volume of men dropped, but they were scattered to hell). Crete, Norway, areas of Poland, Market Garden, the list of operations with large amounts of friendly casualties is much longer than the list of sucessful jumps.

Airborne is dropped long ways out of the engagement behind the enemy, and they hike in like light-infantry. Otherwise, they would get torn to pieces by enemy AA and Air-Power before even hitting the ground (lot of guys died before even jumping at Normandy, and it's reasonable to say we had air superiority there during the jumping). The way Para works in this game is exactly how Para would actually work in real life.

Chestus 2014년 3월 2일 오전 3시 39분 
no para's no wmd its not red alert
K. Hardy [TF187] 2014년 3월 5일 오전 11시 44분 
If they did impliment it, which they've said before that they never would, how would it be achieved, especially in MP, 5000 command points? I see in 4v4 and larger maps, one guy not buying anything to save for WMDs while his team holds off the enemy. Would be a terrible feature.
K. Hardy [TF187]님이 마지막으로 수정; 2014년 3월 5일 오전 11시 45분
23개 중 1-15 표시중
< >
페이지당: 15 30 50
게시된 날짜: 2014년 2월 15일 오후 6시 43분
게시글: 23