Wargame: AirLand Battle > 一般的な話題 > トピックの詳細
Uberch01 2月15日 18時43分
WMD's?
what would you do if if the Next wargame ( after red dragon) they added WMD's to the game( tactical nukes, gass, etc.) and how would they even make it so it would be fair.
最近の変更はUberch01が行いました; 2月15日 18時44分
1-15 / 23 のコメントを表示
< >
Arrow 2月15日 22時27分 
Fairly certain that strategic weapons are out - this is more tactics than anything else. They would sooner add aircraft carriers and AEW&C planes than WMDs.
最近の変更はArrowが行いました; 2月15日 22時27分
orcbuster 2月16日 1時48分 
devs have confirmed that WMDs will never be addednon the tactical map. they are already included on the strategic campaign map.
corpsman-up 2月16日 8時38分 
WMD's like Tactical Nukes aren't realistically ever going to be used on the scale of the Tactical Map (Strategic Map, yes, but I believe the devs want to show what the war would be like had no Nukes been fired. Straight up conventional war).
Uberch01 2月17日 4時46分 
that allready being said it would a whole other factor to the game that could be good or bad and if the devs won't add it there is bound to b a mod out there.
最近の変更はUberch01が行いました; 2月18日 16時15分
julian554327 2月17日 6時53分 
*Uses tactical nuke on AI in a sector in campaign: gets entire force wiped out by counter nukes* pretty much what would happen
Uberch01 2月18日 16時18分 
julian554327 の投稿を引用:
*Uses tactical nuke on AI in a sector in campaign: gets entire force wiped out by counter nukes* pretty much what would happen

there would be anti-nukes and CNB protection on the more expensive vehicles and it would make armored CV's more usefull then they are now.
Magic Striz 2月19日 4時42分 
Armored CV's are useful in conquest when conquering forward, contested sectors. I only use armored CV's and Tank CVs.
Uberch01 2月19日 16時12分 
I said more usefull , Armed CV's saved my ♥♥♥ lots of times
Chestus 2月20日 11時28分 
daisycutter would be nice, a hercules 130 would fly as fast as an A10
Uberch01 2月20日 17時31分 
the bigger the better
[88thIR]FylkirOdinsson 2月25日 22時52分 
I wouldn't mind to see carpet bombing with B-52s or Tupelovs. Hell what I'd really like to see is actual airborne infantry, parachute out of planes onto a battlefield.
Uberch01 3月1日 11時16分 
yea and it would work because it would be obvoise but faster then unloading by helocopter
corpsman-up 3月1日 16時32分 
GCG Fylkir Panzerlied の投稿を引用:
I wouldn't mind to see carpet bombing with B-52s or Tupelovs. Hell what I'd really like to see is actual airborne infantry, parachute out of planes onto a battlefield.

This can't happen. If you know anything about Airborne operations, every single attempt to paradrop infantry directly into an engagement has been a failure (even Normandy, but that suceeded because of volume of men dropped, but they were scattered to hell). Crete, Norway, areas of Poland, Market Garden, the list of operations with large amounts of friendly casualties is much longer than the list of sucessful jumps.

Airborne is dropped long ways out of the engagement behind the enemy, and they hike in like light-infantry. Otherwise, they would get torn to pieces by enemy AA and Air-Power before even hitting the ground (lot of guys died before even jumping at Normandy, and it's reasonable to say we had air superiority there during the jumping). The way Para works in this game is exactly how Para would actually work in real life.

Chestus 3月2日 3時39分 
no para's no wmd its not red alert
K. Hardy [TF187] 3月5日 11時44分 
If they did impliment it, which they've said before that they never would, how would it be achieved, especially in MP, 5000 command points? I see in 4v4 and larger maps, one guy not buying anything to save for WMDs while his team holds off the enemy. Would be a terrible feature.
最近の変更はK. Hardy [TF187]が行いました; 3月5日 11時45分
1-15 / 23 のコメントを表示
< >
ページ毎: 15 30 50
投稿日: 2月15日 18時43分
投稿数: 23