Login
|
Language
Български (Bulgarian)
čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Suomi (Finnish)
Français (French)
Deutsch (German)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Italiano (Italian)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese)
Português-Brasil (Portuguese-Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
Español (Spanish)
Svenska (Swedish)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
ไทย (Thai)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Help us translate Steam



I fixed it buying an Intel CPU.
So you´ve converted to Intel because of one game? ...
Also, this thread was directed at the developers because I´d like to get an official pinned reply / post on this issue.
I just want to know whether they´ve even got plans on optimizing it for AMD FX CPUs or not. If not then they could just make an official statement on the forums and safe AMD FX owners lot of time ... .
Nope.
Because of Serious Sam 3, Deus Ex HR, Arma 3, DayZ etc etc....Basically AMD CPUs freaking sucks, I'll never buy another again !
Once again, look at Dice´s example with Battlefield 3 and 4. It´s possible to optimize games for this architecture and they will run very well on those CPUs.
I guess that either developers are to lazy, too bad or maybe even paid by Intel to not work on such optimization.
Worst part is though that folks like you decide to switch to Intel instead of demanding a fix.
Iv have(son)BF3/4 that runs with problem on AMDs
The cpus that we have had for both games are AMD Phenom II X4 955 FX6100 FX8150 and FX 8350
With HD 5700 HD6790 HD 6850x2 HD7950 and a crap GT630
And no problems,even Crysis NO problems
The Arma engine on the other hand,nothing but low fps
A friend of mine runs an AMD FX-6300 with a GTX 780 2 Gb GDDR5. he´s playing at max settings 1080p and his CPU usage is @ 80%.
NOTE: He didn´t OC his CPU.
I, for example, have even turned off Turbo. Mine runs @ 3,5 GHz max and still give me great performance, just not in this game ... .
Like I´ve said in another thread, the Bulldozer CPU series sucks, Piledriver however is a huge improvement.
Get yourself any of the Piledriver FX CPU and you will see the difference.
Here´s a list of all Piledriver based FX CPUs:
AMD FX-4300
AMD FX-4350
AMD FX-6300
AMD FX-6350
AMD FX-8320
AMD FX-8350
Whatever you do, don´t get the following CPUs.
AMD FX-4100
AMD FX-4130
AMD FX-4170
AMD FX-6100
AMD FX-6200
AMD FX-8100
AMD FX-8120
AMD FX-8150
BF3 & 4 are DX11 games so can make use of multiple threads.
Day-Z is DX9 so cant. Nothing to do with optimization, its to so with the game engine used.
Unless they moved the whole game to an entirely new engine with DX11 i doubt there is much room for performance optimization for CPU with weak single thread performance.
Still DX9. And you´re sure that this is the cause for bad performance?
Well, then they better change that. Well, definetely won´t recommend this game so far. It just sucks. Can´t even enjoy it that way.
Way to go devs.
If you google for settings you can get the game running quite well. I have it running at over 60 fps in most places dropping to around 40 at lowest. Using an old i7 930 and GTX480SLi.
Iv had all cores on OSD on the Arma engines and that's what happening.
So, how many cores can this game utilize? 4?
OSD? What does OSD mean?