Towns > General Discussions > Topic Details
Camulos#linux May 12 @ 9:18am
xavi is burned out
xavi is burned out.
xavi claims the game is complete.
hired guy gets 15%.
hired guy quits.
moebius claims xavi and him are willing to develop a sequal. Yet xavi is burned out on towns?
money grabbers.
Last edited by Camulos#linux; May 12 @ 9:19am
Showing 1-15 of 16 comments
< >
lolibus May 12 @ 10:47am 
it happens
«Avalon» May 12 @ 2:24pm 
We will remember what happened to the first towns. The second one will be bashed like no tommorow and they will make even less than towns.
ace_two_max May 15 @ 10:07am 
He can do what he wishes


But with that name I'll remember it forever and WILL NEVER buy a game that shares his name, could be a AAA title if I see his name or his scamming buddies I will not buy the product.


Let him make another game he will waste his ( OUR) money.
LordUnborn May 15 @ 12:16pm 
Yeah they are a bunch of PIRATES and if I see them in the BAY I will have some unkind words for them.
Tylur Swuft May 15 @ 3:09pm 
fun fact: i like the game.

(not a troll post)
Cyborgt May 15 @ 3:42pm 
Originally posted by Swaghetti Yolonaise:
fun fact: i like the game.

(not a troll post)

Actually, it's both a troll post AND a flame baiting post since you posted something that has nothing to do with the OP (thus the trolling part) and is likely to get people to respond harshly given the forum's current climate (flame baiting.) Whether either of those were your intention, that's still the end result.

EDIT:
Oh, I forgot to mention that it contributes nothing to any conversation being held here which is a significant part of it being both trolling and flame baiting. All you've done is make a statement for the sake of making it.
Last edited by Cyborgt; May 15 @ 3:47pm
Tylur Swuft May 16 @ 1:46pm 
sorry, really did not mean to bait. i will elaborate.
you mentioned the "current climate" and the OP called the makers "money grabbers". i just intended to state that the product is not a pile of crap, as many would probably agree on, but there are also people who are OK with the game. i understand that many customers are discontent due to development being halted, but the game is in its state playable and can be fun. although it is pre-1.0 i believe it to be 'readier' than several fully released games which turned to be out cashgrabs.

therefore, a sequel would not be "money grabbing" imho, but perfectly OK, although continuation of development would be appreciated. sorry again for giving you the impression of baiting.
Last edited by Tylur Swuft; May 16 @ 1:47pm
Miles May 16 @ 1:47pm 
I understand developer burnout. It's why I don't buy games on early access much. But saying "Yeah, we got burnt out, but we're making a sequel." Wat?
Solo Solitaire (Banned) May 16 @ 1:52pm 
Originally posted by Swaghetti Yolonaise:
sorry, really did not mean to bait. i will elaborate.
you mentioned the "current climate" and the OP called the makers "money grabbers". i just intended to state that the product is not a pile of crap, as many would probably agree on, but there are also people who are OK with the game. i understand that many customers are discontent due to development being halted, but the game is in its state playable and can be fun. although it is pre-1.0 i believe it to be 'readier' than several fully released games which turned to be out cashgrabs.

therefore, a sequel would not be "money grabbing" imho, but perfectly OK, although continuation of development would be appreciated. sorry again for giving you the impression of baiting.
I disagree entirely.

I tried REALLY hard to find fun in Towns and there wasn't any there.

Also, we now know that Xavi was sick of working on Towns at the time of release. He fruadulently claimed it was finished to mislead people into making a purchase. I'd definitely classify that as a money grab, even if a minority of players, like yourself, are happy with it as is.
R4gegamingstudios May 16 @ 2:49pm 
I make games myself I will always make them free even if they are quality games. Because I'm not a great devloper but at least I will refund people who donated twice by accident or something. But if ever quit making my game I would not lie and say is finished.

But the developers lies is what annoys me a lot I don't mind if they quit for a reason like they lost their arms or something like that but lies I can't stand.

Sorry for a randomish post I'm tired currently so sorry for mistakes.
Innocent_OJ (Banned) May 16 @ 4:59pm 
I dont recall which version I liked the most but agreee that it was a past version.
DogMakeAMove! May 17 @ 9:14pm 
And when this game first came out.. It had so much potential. Maybe ill remake of it in a similar fasion one day.. *andnotabandonthegame* Cough cough
Innocent_OJ (Banned) May 17 @ 9:22pm 
i can;t wait for a superior clone.
Solo Solitaire (Banned) May 18 @ 12:30am 
The idea of running a town in a game like Diablo is a great idea. I imagine somebody will actually make a game (rather than part of a game) like that some day. Until that day comes, Gnomoria will fill the void nicely. It does almost everything that Towns does, except much better.
Multi May 18 @ 3:28am 
Originally posted by Solo Solitaire:
The idea of running a town in a game like Diablo is a great idea. I imagine somebody will actually make a game (rather than part of a game) like that some day. Until that day comes, Gnomoria will fill the void nicely. It does almost everything that Towns does, except much better.

IS THAT THE POINT OF TOWNS I THOUGHT IT WAS JUST TO MAKE A TOWN LIKE IN GNOMORIA, THE GOAL WAS TO MAKE IT LIKE THAT NO WONDER I DIDNT ENJOY THIS.

I need to play properly now
Showing 1-15 of 16 comments
< >
Per page: 15 30 50