ACDSee 15 > 일반 토론 > 제목 정보
Archangel [GWJ] 2012년 12월 11일 오후 1시 35분
Use XnView (or something else) instead
It's basically the same thing, and it's awesome and free. Or Picasa, or IrfanView, or FastStone, or Photoscape, depending on your needs and preferences. Pretty much anything in the "Photos and Images" category of FileHippo or AlternativeTo (dot net).
Archangel [GWJ]님이 마지막으로 수정; 2012년 12월 11일 오후 1시 36분
15개 중 1-15 표시중
< >
Bulldogs 2012년 12월 11일 오후 8시 54분 
Yeh XnView has been around for eons and is a nice free tool.
Xv0st 2012년 12월 12일 오전 4시 20분 
use XnView all the time.
Zec 2012년 12월 12일 오전 6시 17분 
I don't know if this ACDSee develops RAW, but if it does, rawtherapee is a good free (GPL) replacement.
Lupus Domesticus 2012년 12월 12일 오전 11시 55분 
IrfanView is also very good. And its free.
Sam 2012년 12월 12일 오후 3시 38분 
I know you people love freeware applications, but seriously. If I'm going to be using an application everyday, I want it to have an intuitive and pleasant looking GUI. ACDSee has a nice GUI and more features than the free applications. Sure it may be somewhat overpriced for what it does, but it's not that unreasonable.
뷔엘 2012년 12월 13일 오전 5시 58분 
XnView is best...
twitch.tv/the_nsix 2012년 12월 27일 오전 2시 26분 
I've used ACDsee in the past and it was awesome! If you are a professional photographer ACDsee might turn you on. If you are a hobbyist the one of the free alternatives should hold you over.
Syrsly 2012년 12월 27일 오전 2시 48분 
ACDSee offers speedier production time and more convenience than most other applications. It is reasonably priced for that. However, I have Photoshop, Paint Tool Sai, and so many other applications for image editing and illustration. I do not need another one.
kpetrmail 2012년 12월 27일 오전 3시 25분 
Zec님이 먼저 게시:
I don't know if this ACDSee develops RAW, but if it does, rawtherapee is a good free (GPL) replacement.
XNView has some support of RAW reading/writing, too.
MrWildWolf 2012년 12월 27일 오전 4시 55분 
Sam님이 먼저 게시:
I know you people love freeware applications, but seriously. If I'm going to be using an application everyday, I want it to have an intuitive and pleasant looking GUI. ACDSee has a nice GUI and more features than the free applications. Sure it may be somewhat overpriced for what it does, but it's not that unreasonable.

nsix님이 먼저 게시:
I've used ACDsee in the past and it was awesome! If you are a professional photographer ACDsee might turn you on. If you are a hobbyist the one of the free alternatives should hold you over.

Both comments explain pretty well what kind of users might want to try ACDSee.
If you are not sure there is a trial version on their web site.
wretch 2012년 12월 27일 오전 5시 27분 
I've kept up with ACDSee for a decade due to its manual sort feature. Do any free ones offer this?
Bulldogs 2012년 12월 27일 오전 6시 41분 
nsix님이 먼저 게시:
I've used ACDsee in the past and it was awesome! If you are a professional photographer ACDsee might turn you on. If you are a hobbyist the one of the free alternatives should hold you over.

If you are a professional you won't be using this, lightroom would be your best choice for the most part or other professional photo editing software not this.

This is aimed at mums and dads or people who don't know any better that other applications do the same thing for free.
Kektimus 2012년 12월 27일 오전 11시 49분 
Try FastStone Image Viewer too. Free and extremely powerful.
Homosexual Pie Row 2012년 12월 27일 오후 12시 04분 
Sam님이 먼저 게시:
I know you people love freeware applications, but seriously. If I'm going to be using an application everyday, I want it to have an intuitive and pleasant looking GUI. ACDSee has a nice GUI and more features than the free applications. Sure it may be somewhat overpriced for what it does, but it's not that unreasonable.
I agree with you about the GUI. I tried XnView just now. I didn't like the interface. It was nowhere near as polished. (Not that I haven't had complaints with ACD's freezes and crashes.)

But I have to give credit to another review. This thing is aimed more at photographers and less at casual users. Knowing that, it makes even less sense for it this software be on Steam. And if they really are aiming for casual users, their price is too high, and the discounted upgrades are too often and too high. Seriously, the upgrade price to next year's version is more than I'd really want to pay for this software in the first place, brand new.
Games Brown 2013년 8월 25일 오후 1시 40분 
C= 64님이 먼저 게시:
nsix님이 먼저 게시:
I've used ACDsee in the past and it was awesome! If you are a professional photographer ACDsee might turn you on. If you are a hobbyist the one of the free alternatives should hold you over.

If you are a professional you won't be using this, lightroom would be your best choice for the most part or other professional photo editing software not this.

But this is a third of the cost of Lightroom and it'll run on random laptops whereas LR5 requires a DX10 GPU. Not all photographers are rich.
15개 중 1-15 표시중
< >
페이지당: 15 30 50