ACDSee 15 > 一般的な話題 > トピックの詳細
Archangel [GWJ] 2012年12月11日 13時35分
Use XnView (or something else) instead
It's basically the same thing, and it's awesome and free. Or Picasa, or IrfanView, or FastStone, or Photoscape, depending on your needs and preferences. Pretty much anything in the "Photos and Images" category of FileHippo or AlternativeTo (dot net).
最近の変更はArchangel [GWJ]が行いました; 2012年12月11日 13時36分
1-15 / 15 のコメントを表示
< >
Bulldogs 2012年12月11日 20時54分 
Yeh XnView has been around for eons and is a nice free tool.
Xv0st 2012年12月12日 4時20分 
use XnView all the time.
Zec 2012年12月12日 6時17分 
I don't know if this ACDSee develops RAW, but if it does, rawtherapee is a good free (GPL) replacement.
Lupus Domesticus 2012年12月12日 11時55分 
IrfanView is also very good. And its free.
Sam 2012年12月12日 15時38分 
I know you people love freeware applications, but seriously. If I'm going to be using an application everyday, I want it to have an intuitive and pleasant looking GUI. ACDSee has a nice GUI and more features than the free applications. Sure it may be somewhat overpriced for what it does, but it's not that unreasonable.
뷔엘 2012年12月13日 5時58分 
XnView is best...
twitch.tv/the_nsix 2012年12月27日 2時26分 
I've used ACDsee in the past and it was awesome! If you are a professional photographer ACDsee might turn you on. If you are a hobbyist the one of the free alternatives should hold you over.
TapSkill 2012年12月27日 2時48分 
ACDSee offers speedier production time and more convenience than most other applications. It is reasonably priced for that. However, I have Photoshop, Paint Tool Sai, and so many other applications for image editing and illustration. I do not need another one.
kpetrmail 2012年12月27日 3時25分 
Zec の投稿を引用:
I don't know if this ACDSee develops RAW, but if it does, rawtherapee is a good free (GPL) replacement.
XNView has some support of RAW reading/writing, too.
MrWildWolf 2012年12月27日 4時55分 
Sam の投稿を引用:
I know you people love freeware applications, but seriously. If I'm going to be using an application everyday, I want it to have an intuitive and pleasant looking GUI. ACDSee has a nice GUI and more features than the free applications. Sure it may be somewhat overpriced for what it does, but it's not that unreasonable.

nsix の投稿を引用:
I've used ACDsee in the past and it was awesome! If you are a professional photographer ACDsee might turn you on. If you are a hobbyist the one of the free alternatives should hold you over.

Both comments explain pretty well what kind of users might want to try ACDSee.
If you are not sure there is a trial version on their web site.
wretch 2012年12月27日 5時27分 
I've kept up with ACDSee for a decade due to its manual sort feature. Do any free ones offer this?
Bulldogs 2012年12月27日 6時41分 
nsix の投稿を引用:
I've used ACDsee in the past and it was awesome! If you are a professional photographer ACDsee might turn you on. If you are a hobbyist the one of the free alternatives should hold you over.

If you are a professional you won't be using this, lightroom would be your best choice for the most part or other professional photo editing software not this.

This is aimed at mums and dads or people who don't know any better that other applications do the same thing for free.
Kektimus 2012年12月27日 11時49分 
Try FastStone Image Viewer too. Free and extremely powerful.
Homosexual Pie Row 2012年12月27日 12時04分 
Sam の投稿を引用:
I know you people love freeware applications, but seriously. If I'm going to be using an application everyday, I want it to have an intuitive and pleasant looking GUI. ACDSee has a nice GUI and more features than the free applications. Sure it may be somewhat overpriced for what it does, but it's not that unreasonable.
I agree with you about the GUI. I tried XnView just now. I didn't like the interface. It was nowhere near as polished. (Not that I haven't had complaints with ACD's freezes and crashes.)

But I have to give credit to another review. This thing is aimed more at photographers and less at casual users. Knowing that, it makes even less sense for it this software be on Steam. And if they really are aiming for casual users, their price is too high, and the discounted upgrades are too often and too high. Seriously, the upgrade price to next year's version is more than I'd really want to pay for this software in the first place, brand new.
Games Brown 2013年8月25日 13時40分 
C= 64 の投稿を引用:
nsix の投稿を引用:
I've used ACDsee in the past and it was awesome! If you are a professional photographer ACDsee might turn you on. If you are a hobbyist the one of the free alternatives should hold you over.

If you are a professional you won't be using this, lightroom would be your best choice for the most part or other professional photo editing software not this.

But this is a third of the cost of Lightroom and it'll run on random laptops whereas LR5 requires a DX10 GPU. Not all photographers are rich.
1-15 / 15 のコメントを表示
< >
ページ毎: 15 30 50