which player is strongest at RUSE?

[ShaKa]

I think QUEBEC first.Rich experience in the elder.

[Sadpan]

I found Quebec's 3rd alt, I wonder how many more he's going to make.

[Invisible Eyes]

There is no such thing.

- and who to evaluate, us less experienced players? According to the noobs all good players are cheating, lol. That said from 3500 hours and up I think most of these players knows what they are doing.

An experienced player who quit, because he know there is no chance for winning, when he found out his team-mate is a very new just turned lvl 100, is that a "strong" player?

How do you define strong?
We could add some categories, pc?, do we talk solo 1vs1, specific maps, specific nations or combi-"nations". Air player etc.
Different playing styles, "Lucky Punch", who go full whit all he have, lol and a little more rushing Italy tanks and keep steady, taking the change, he is a 5 minute player, playing the lottery.

What about taking the lead or being a supportive player, teamspirit on large teams etc.

Any tournaments ?

[ShaKa]

u only have 283 hurs.u kill all many thound hrs player.u r frist in big mouth

[Invisible Eyes]

Impressive :)
I can't recognise any names there, lol, what platforms do we talk about?

[Invisible Eyes]

Found a few videos of Québec playing on youtube, they are back from like 2015 though, but you dont always win :)

[Invisible Eyes]

Agree. So they did not got your approval? I don't hope anyone have posted me playing without asking me.

[Invisible Eyes]

Well, that is not nice, lol.
I cannot recall I have played you, sorry. How are players like Raiser..., Yise1 or k. k. stergios (not sure of the spellings) to you, pure noobs lol ?

[Sadpan]

Originally posted by Invisible Eyes:

Well, that is not nice, lol.
I cannot recall I have played you, sorry. How are players like Raiser..., Yise1 or k. k. stergios (not sure of the spellings) to you, pure noobs lol ?

Stop responding to them! They are autistic trolls with egos larger than the ♥♥♥♥ of Roberto Esquivel Cabrera. It is pretty entertaining to mess with them, but don't let them get to your head.

[Shepard]

Without active tournaments, the question of "best player" seems fairly useless. Back in 2010-2012 where this discussion would have made more sense (at least to me), I'd have to say people like Deagle, Tigga or Persian.

[ShaKa]

Originally posted by ŊЏ | Shepard:

Without active tournaments, the question of "best player" seems fairly useless. Back in 2010-2012 where this discussion would have made more sense (at least to me), I'd have to say people like Deagle, Tigga or Persian.

nu pome can kill them，but quebec can kill pome.so the no.1 is quebec.the best player not u not me.

[Sadpan]

Originally posted by ŊЏ | Shepard:

Without active tournaments, the question of "best player" seems fairly useless. Back in 2010-2012 where this discussion would have made more sense (at least to me), I'd have to say people like Deagle, Tigga or Persian.

I completely forgot about Deagle, I've faced him before and got utterly shrecked, but that was long ago... good times.

[ShaKa]

Originally posted by Québec:

If you want to understand perfomances and titles here is everything you need:
http://steamcommunity.com/groups/januera/discussions/0/612823460268894447/

Now it's up to you to declare the most titles won is the greatest, but I tend to differ because many of the early tournaments were organised and scheduled with poor effort. Needless to say, when you want a tournament to have legitimity, you need to get as much players as possible so the winner makes sens. Back then when many thousands were actively playing this game, their tournaments only reached 10 to 20 players. That is very low. In comparison, we achieved the same participation years later with a fraction of the community, when the game was said to be "dead".

But make no mistake, the current best players of last tournaments are superior in the sens that if they would play against previous competition (and they did in casual matches) they would all crush them (and they did in casual matches).

Ruse has become the past, you are the best in my opponent.Can u buy Steel Division: Normandy 44,dear friend.

[ShaKa]

Originally posted by Québec:

Originally posted by Maha^vairocana:

Ruse has become the past, you are the best in my opponent.Can u buy Steel Division: Normandy 44,dear friend.

I'd rather save my money and buy myself a good blow job.

I give u my big di ck, u give me money.I use your money buy Steel Division: Normandy 44.Good idea.

[Invisible Eyes]

Q: Well the names I mention are for my lvl very good players, but not unreachable on a good day, some of the good players I have only seen playing Treason, pretty much the same routine every time. Always fixed so there was no other hard opponent on both sides.

Concerning fast income on multiplayer, I always thought about whether it does work if all players start with admins? Concerning doing the math for optimal production, that's is also why I stop, if I had to take it to the next step, I should sit with a list of specification on units and numbers for this and that, that is going to far for casual gaming

I might recognise 3 players from the tournament lists, but cannot remember their skills, sorry. I foremost play multiplayer teams in 1945, no limit, even a low lvl player could probably beat me in a 1 vs 1 map on time.
The Tournaments seems to be mainly 1 vs 1 on time. Don't you think that there is a huge different in being good at different maps, modes etc., you just master them all?
Of course this thread did not ask about the strongest team, but single player, so in that sense I can take back my word.
In random match teams it is hard to evaluate individual skills. I never met teams/players that I considered extremely overpowered compared to what else I have met in the pc lobby.

[76561198366594898]

手动滑稽