安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
It looks like it's because there are only four reviews for it, and one of them gave it a 30 so it brought the entire score way down.
I think it depends on what sort of PC game you are talking about. For casual games there's a lot of overlap betwen the PC and mobile. Obviously, if you are looking for a long, involved AAA game then a mobile port is probably not going to be up to your standards but there are a fair amount of people who enjoy casual games on the PC.
Personally, I like a mix of both. I do like longer and more complex games but at the same time sometimes I am not in the mood and/or don't have the time for them and would rather play a more casual game on my PC.
I think there is room for both sorts of games on the PC and I don't really think it's fair to automatically write off a port of a mobile game simple because it started as a mobile game.
I mean I think it's fine if someone criticizes for example the controls or other aspects of the game itself but when I see comments like 'Another cell phone game! This sucks!' etc I don't think that's a valid criticism of the actual game on its own merits.