Инсталирайте Steam
вход
|
език
Опростен китайски (简体中文)
Традиционен китайски (繁體中文)
Японски (日本語)
Корейски (한국어)
Тайландски (ไทย)
Чешки (Čeština)
Датски (Dansk)
Немски (Deutsch)
Английски (English)
Испански — Испания (Español — España)
Испански — Латинска Америка (Español — Latinoamérica)
Гръцки (Ελληνικά)
Френски (Français)
Италиански (Italiano)
Индонезийски (Bahasa Indonesia)
Унгарски (Magyar)
Холандски (Nederlands)
Норвежки (Norsk)
Полски (Polski)
Португалски (Português)
Бразилски португалски (Português — Brasil)
Румънски (Română)
Руски (Русский)
Финландски (Suomi)
Шведски (Svenska)
Турски (Türkçe)
Виетнамски (Tiếng Việt)
Украински (Українська)
Докладване на проблем с превода
It looks like it's because there are only four reviews for it, and one of them gave it a 30 so it brought the entire score way down.
I think it depends on what sort of PC game you are talking about. For casual games there's a lot of overlap betwen the PC and mobile. Obviously, if you are looking for a long, involved AAA game then a mobile port is probably not going to be up to your standards but there are a fair amount of people who enjoy casual games on the PC.
Personally, I like a mix of both. I do like longer and more complex games but at the same time sometimes I am not in the mood and/or don't have the time for them and would rather play a more casual game on my PC.
I think there is room for both sorts of games on the PC and I don't really think it's fair to automatically write off a port of a mobile game simple because it started as a mobile game.
I mean I think it's fine if someone criticizes for example the controls or other aspects of the game itself but when I see comments like 'Another cell phone game! This sucks!' etc I don't think that's a valid criticism of the actual game on its own merits.