Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
What does it mean to be waffled?
Like baffled, but more breakfast friendly.
And you can add syrup for extra taste to irony.
I know it's an alien concept to most people on the steam hubs.
I've a couple of prior releases, but when I noticed the hastened way they were releasing sequels, I simply decided not to follow them sequel after sequel.
And did you liked my profile? It makes me feel all dirty thinking someone with such a self-absorved personality watched through it. This is how pretty girls must feel on a Mcdonalds.
I just hope to be pretty enough
Anyhow. I saw a nonsensical way of naming the sequels, as in; Instead of including the year it was released on to difference eachother, including the next years for being too lazy to come up with a different sequel name.
But I agree, a name is just a name. But there simply are names making more sense than others.
There are reasons for why the game uses the next year instead of the current year.
The game follows the real card game, more precisely the core sets. This month, Magic 2014 is released so the game gets the same year in the name.
Magic 2014 is released now and will be legal for most of next years which is why it gets next years name instead of this years. It's marketing. in 2014 people wouldnt want to be playing Magic 2013.
Oh, I see. That makes more sense, thank you.
But expect me to add you to steam to discuss this matter if I see a Magic: The gathering 2015 this same year.
Yes but strangely enough 2014 has exactly the same bugs as 2012, go figure....
'bro do u even magic?
Now I know that a 'tard or two will bash this or continue to talk out of their butt on my comment and I flat out don't care. I'm not asking OTHERS to join me but stating semi-formally why I won't be buying it.
If WotC can't even fix game 1 but produces game 2 and now with game 3 and 4 with the same probleme as before, I can say that I am done. I mostly bought this one as they said that it had Slivers and I do have hope for the game still but seeing the complete stagment that I seen in this latest version, I am just done.
---------------
Unless the Slivers deck is flat out better and cards added into it that a REAL Sliver player would use, I'm completely out. If they add the badly needed Gemhide Sliver and OTHER ways of winning other than attacking I could be OKAY with the constant ignoring of the populations bug reports by WotC.
However, with the same bugs over, and over, and yet over again - how much more crap do we need to go through to get simple and easy to do fixes done?
------------------
At least since the first game, they made taking OUT card at least able to do. At first, you couldn't take out the 'meh cards at all and with this last version they made land adjustment workable. So even with a complete (I would fire you if you were a worker although you do SOME work) work ethic and ideology,
At least WotC at did SOMETHING that was requested. Even if it was done in a complete mediocure and overduely late way.
...It is like turning in a college course final for your Science class seven months after the class ended and still expected that your "D" would become a "C" so you could keep your scholarship. It wouldn't work there so why is it okay for WotC to do it here?
So then it would be remake of MTG DotP 2014 becouse theres already 4 DotP games on steam