Magic 2014 > General Discussions > Topic Details
Margorach Jul 3, 2013 @ 4:41pm
And soon in August 2013.. Duels 2015!
Just because it makes complete sense to be so lazy as to name a game after a year it wasn't released on.
Showing 1-15 of 16 comments
< >
Tehkayy Jul 3, 2013 @ 4:44pm 
it's like cars man, this is how it always is. 2013 was in 2012, now 2014 in 2013, 2015 in 2014. cars come out up to 8 months before the year too. 2014 mustang is out right now bro.
Tehkayy Jul 3, 2013 @ 4:45pm 
get with the picture
Margorach Jul 3, 2013 @ 7:00pm 
I'm waffled of not seeing before how very much related the car industry was with the gaming one.
xkenoonx Jul 3, 2013 @ 7:14pm 
Originally posted by Margorach:
I'm waffled of not seeing before how very much related the car industry was with the gaming one.

What does it mean to be waffled?
Margorach Jul 3, 2013 @ 7:16pm 
Originally posted by xkenoonx:
Originally posted by Margorach:
I'm waffled of not seeing before how very much related the car industry was with the gaming one.

What does it mean to be waffled?

Like baffled, but more breakfast friendly.

And you can add syrup for extra taste to irony.
Last edited by Margorach; Jul 3, 2013 @ 7:18pm
Rupert Jul 3, 2013 @ 10:48pm 
Madden, NHL, other sports games...
Samalot Jul 3, 2013 @ 11:15pm 
Originally posted by Margorach:
Just because it makes complete sense to be so lazy as to name a game after a year it wasn't released on.
lol you don't even own or play the game. It's so tragic how people are such losers that they stalk the forums of games they don't like and choose to focus their entire lives on negativity instead of actually *shock horror* focusing on games they like.

I know it's an alien concept to most people on the steam hubs.
Lцсїап º¹ Jul 3, 2013 @ 11:15pm 
Agreed. Just call it DotP 4. Anyway its just a name.
Last edited by Lцсїап º¹; Jul 3, 2013 @ 11:16pm
Margorach Jul 5, 2013 @ 8:13am 
Originally posted by Samalot:
Originally posted by Margorach:
Just because it makes complete sense to be so lazy as to name a game after a year it wasn't released on.
lol you don't even own or play the game. It's so tragic how people are such losers that they stalk the forums of games they don't like and choose to focus their entire lives on negativity instead of actually *shock horror* focusing on games they like.

I know it's an alien concept to most people on the steam hubs.

I've a couple of prior releases, but when I noticed the hastened way they were releasing sequels, I simply decided not to follow them sequel after sequel.

And did you liked my profile? It makes me feel all dirty thinking someone with such a self-absorved personality watched through it. This is how pretty girls must feel on a Mcdonalds.

I just hope to be pretty enough

Originally posted by Łųćįąñ º¹:
Agreed. Just call it DotP 4. Anyway its just a name.

Anyhow. I saw a nonsensical way of naming the sequels, as in; Instead of including the year it was released on to difference eachother, including the next years for being too lazy to come up with a different sequel name.

But I agree, a name is just a name. But there simply are names making more sense than others.
Last edited by Margorach; Jul 5, 2013 @ 8:14am
Relmatos Jul 5, 2013 @ 9:18am 
I know the OP just tried to troll but I'll bite.
There are reasons for why the game uses the next year instead of the current year.
The game follows the real card game, more precisely the core sets. This month, Magic 2014 is released so the game gets the same year in the name.
Magic 2014 is released now and will be legal for most of next years which is why it gets next years name instead of this years. It's marketing. in 2014 people wouldnt want to be playing Magic 2013.
Margorach Jul 5, 2013 @ 9:48am 
Originally posted by relmatos:
Directly above me.

Oh, I see. That makes more sense, thank you.

But expect me to add you to steam to discuss this matter if I see a Magic: The gathering 2015 this same year.
Discryptor Jul 5, 2013 @ 3:15pm 
Originally posted by relmatos:
I know the OP just tried to troll but I'll bite.
There are reasons for why the game uses the next year instead of the current year.
The game follows the real card game, more precisely the core sets. This month, Magic 2014 is released so the game gets the same year in the name.
Magic 2014 is released now and will be legal for most of next years which is why it gets next years name instead of this years. It's marketing. in 2014 people wouldnt want to be playing Magic 2013.

Yes but strangely enough 2014 has exactly the same bugs as 2012, go figure....
Last edited by Discryptor; Jul 5, 2013 @ 3:15pm
413X4ND3R 84R73R Jul 5, 2013 @ 3:21pm 
They release this at the same time of the actual paper 2014 core set to let players grow familar with the cards in that set and to introduce new players to the current core set and it's mechanics.

'bro do u even magic?
Bud Jul 5, 2013 @ 3:23pm 
I see that but I am boycotting is upcoming game...even if alone. I am fed up with the constant bugs and over nerfing decks to make the few more popular deck types more wanted. Since WotC flat out doesn't understand the community, I will flat out not buy the next game. And honestly this kind of sucks as I LIKED the game but I NEED my principles more.

Now I know that a 'tard or two will bash this or continue to talk out of their butt on my comment and I flat out don't care. I'm not asking OTHERS to join me but stating semi-formally why I won't be buying it.

If WotC can't even fix game 1 but produces game 2 and now with game 3 and 4 with the same probleme as before, I can say that I am done. I mostly bought this one as they said that it had Slivers and I do have hope for the game still but seeing the complete stagment that I seen in this latest version, I am just done.

---------------

Unless the Slivers deck is flat out better and cards added into it that a REAL Sliver player would use, I'm completely out. If they add the badly needed Gemhide Sliver and OTHER ways of winning other than attacking I could be OKAY with the constant ignoring of the populations bug reports by WotC.

However, with the same bugs over, and over, and yet over again - how much more crap do we need to go through to get simple and easy to do fixes done?

------------------

At least since the first game, they made taking OUT card at least able to do. At first, you couldn't take out the 'meh cards at all and with this last version they made land adjustment workable. So even with a complete (I would fire you if you were a worker although you do SOME work) work ethic and ideology,

At least WotC at did SOMETHING that was requested. Even if it was done in a complete mediocure and overduely late way.

...It is like turning in a college course final for your Science class seven months after the class ended and still expected that your "D" would become a "C" so you could keep your scholarship. It wouldn't work there so why is it okay for WotC to do it here?
Last edited by Bud; Jul 5, 2013 @ 3:34pm
Mappu Mar 26 @ 7:37am 
Originally posted by Łцсїап º¹:
Agreed. Just call it DotP 4. Anyway its just a name.

So then it would be remake of MTG DotP 2014 becouse theres already 4 DotP games on steam
Showing 1-15 of 16 comments
< >
Per page: 15 30 50
Date Posted: Jul 3, 2013 @ 4:41pm
Posts: 16