Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
Anyways, yea, altrough some criticism is pretty damn right (Having a complex game with a steep learning curve is totally alright, but, you know, then you should really provide a more detailed introduction to gameplay features in tutorial, not to mention menu interface needs some polishing and resolution / control settings / gameplay bugs may ruin the entire game for some folks), overall.. think those reviews are mostly so biased since at first moments the game seems extremely rough, and those technical issues, I mean ones like resolution bug, and hard for begineers interface ruin the whole begining and after that people have little intrest to learn more about the game.
Oh great. Now I feel like reading the reviews to have fun watching dumb people reviewing this game.
the Metacritic scores don't give this game justice.