Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
I have owned quite a few MS Flight Sims before and I havent enjoyed that many of them - the best one was FS2004 Century of Flight just for the authentic old scenarios you can play which I do miss in FSX. But practically everything else is better in FSX - its the first flight sim that I actually felt looked ultra realistic. Just donwload some of the Vertical Studios scenarios to see what an imppresive game it can be (the Geneva default scenery is fantastic):
http://www.vertical-studios.net/?utm_source=Newsletter+Subscribers&utm_campaign=bde98670e8-CCW4_launch&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_06f44d0c3d-bde98670e8-13877393
As far as MS Flight is concerned I cant say anything about it because I have never tried it, but I know it looks far too limited for me to be able to enjoy it so I havent even bothered downloading the free version.
When it comes to military flying nothing beats Digital Combat Simulator where the level of attention paid to detail is AMAZING! Im currently looking forward to the DCS MiG-21 Bis by a 3rd party developer in Hungary,
I installed FSX the other day and bought a few payware aircraft (including PMDG of course).
MS Flight is a game and can't be compared with any of the above. It looks good enough but in terms of actual flight simulation not so much. The fact that they actually sell a C-47 to fly in 3rd person view says it all I think!
They all have their strengths and weaknesses. MS Flight was essentially stillborn and yet has some good core gameplay value. I like the combination/flight-sim/adventure-roleplaying thing that this game has.
It runs very well on my aging Core2 quad system, so if you are having trouble on an i5 system I woldn't know what's wrong.
By the way, there is now C 47 in MS Flight. It's a C 46, and you don't need that or any other of the add-on aircraft to have a good time with this other than the Maule M 7 which seems to modeled very well.
So for 15 bucks or so you can get very many hours of entertainment, if you like THAT kind of entertainment. Some do and some don't. I enjoy it quite a bit.
But you have to compare apples with apples.
If in MS Flight you take the Maule for a flight in Alaska, and compare it with taking the Maule for a flight in Alaska in FSX (with updated scenery)
You will experience MS Flight will have.
Better physics, better handling, better aerodynamic model.
Better visuals, better lighting, better high res texturing, better mesh for landscape.
Better performance, for trees, buildings, and no sudden FPS drops, and finally uses a bit of GPU
Better menu`s, more intuitive layouts, better user experience in general.
But virtually no Moddability, which is very sad.
And no big airliners for the FSX buttonjunkies that like to fly purely on autopilot/ILS and other automated systems.
The main reason FSX still exists is that eventho MS Flight is technically better at everything, in FSX you can (eventho less realistically/beautifully) fly over your own country, and fly with the plane you like most (eventho not as realistically).
And FSX has big planes which facilitate to the "Community/Userbase" which ended up being the userbase, because FSX runs at such an appalling low FPS/lack of smoothness, that the only thing you can somewhat do in FSX is fly the plane on instruments, instead of by hand like a real Pilot. :P
If MS Flight is on sale (around 75% discount on everything) getting all scenery and deluxe aircraft (with cockpit) is imho a must have addon to your Flightsim collection.
Normal price is imho to high, but then people pay more than 50$ for PMDG planes for FSX.
It falls short on the amount and diversity of planes and scenery however.
You can't possibly mean that this is better than FSX or even FS9?1? Sure, it looks good but thats it. I have hundreds of hours in FS9 and FSX and I like realistic flying. I also fly the DCS-series for military aviation. MS Flight can't be compared to any of those in terms of realism i.e. SIMULATION and immersion.
The main reason that sims like FSX still exists is the level of realism: you can fly anywhere in the world, in any weather you want, use basically any aircraft you want, use photorealistic scenery (that makes MS Flight look like Donkey Kong) and quality aircraft from devs like PMDG, Majestic or Carenado.
MS Flight is good for one thing: semi-realistic low level flying in a limited world. With a very limited amount of aircraft.