Steam installieren
Anmelden
|
Sprache
简体中文 (Vereinfachtes Chinesisch)
繁體中文 (Traditionelles Chinesisch)
日本語 (Japanisch)
한국어 (Koreanisch)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarisch)
Čeština (Tschechisch)
Dansk (Dänisch)
English (Englisch)
Español – España (Spanisch – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (Lateinamerikanisches Spanisch)
Ελληνικά (Griechisch)
Français (Französisch)
Italiano (Italienisch)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Ungarisch)
Nederlands (Niederländisch)
Norsk (Norwegisch)
Polski (Polnisch)
Português – Portugal (Portugiesisch – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (Portugiesisch – Brasilien)
Română (Rumänisch)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Finnisch)
Svenska (Schwedisch)
Türkçe (Türkisch)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisch)
Українська (Ukrainisch)
Ein Übersetzungsproblem melden
EU4 is more about playing the great game of conquest and dominance, while CK2 is more focused on roleplaying and living the history.
Try both demos, see which gameplay most intrigues you, and then buy the game closer to you expectations and desires.
EUIV = nation simulation so the game is based around you playing as a nation and getting it in and out of trouble, expanding it, etc. (I'd compare it a lot to Civilization with 10x more meat to it). Example: You have to have a reason to go to war with someone, so you send a spy in to create a claim and take a region out, or insult them so maybe they attack you.
EU4 really isn't that complicated once you get the basics of the new trade system and power points down. The game tells you what your opinion of other countries is, which limits your foreign policy avenues -- so not much to figure out there. There's a bit more randomness involved in EU's battles than CK2s too.
There is but it's different stuff. It's more economical like putting more buildings in your province and I find the peacetime relations are a lot more detailed. There's just as much to "manage" per say but it's not about specific people like CKII is.
Not that EU4 is bad by any stretch of the imagination I simply prefer CK2 by, right now, a long shot. CK2 is a lot more personal. Personal characters, family, dynasty and politics. Ahhh the politics. I absolutely love all the systems in CK2 and because everything is personal, and not national, you're a lot more connected and invested I feel. The stories that happen have a lot more umpth behind them not because "southern Ireland is revolting" but "my bastid of a cousin is making a claim on my throne and happens to have his uncle and Earl Jimmy on his side!! >:o I knew I should've had my dad smother him in bed!"
Both are excellent choices in the end, I just prefer the personal touch of CK2