VAC BANNED Aug 25, 2014 @ 11:46pm
DARN ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥!
I surrendered twice, and then I lost my game. It was so cool, cus I had a queen named Madona who had a daughter named Athena and Athena was pregnant... I had a dynasty of Queens! I have never been able to do it... I was playing Brittany
Showing 1-7 of 7 comments
< >
chincy Aug 26, 2014 @ 12:36am 
its a mans world
Supplican Aug 26, 2014 @ 2:46am 
Why do you mince oaths with "darn", but then go with the full "♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥"? Weird!
markdb92 Aug 26, 2014 @ 3:42am 
allowing women to rule in ck2 is asking for trouble for your releam ie duke inherting other dukes which forces you to be a bi.tch to your vassals.
Deep Hurting Aug 26, 2014 @ 6:03am 
On the other hand, preventing women from ruling is going to cause more dynastic lines to die out and pass to more distant relatives. Agnatic/cognatic is the default for a reason.
lordcessa Aug 26, 2014 @ 7:32am 
All my queens are the heroines of their country: Win all the wars, unify lots of territories...
Probably you will have a few claimants or a succession war, but if you kick them out you will probably have the longest, powerful reign in the moment.
That's why I always want to play cathar: To have the cognatic succession.
Last edited by lordcessa; Aug 26, 2014 @ 7:33am
Thadian Aug 26, 2014 @ 12:12pm 
Originally posted by Supplican:
Why do you mince oaths with "darn", but then go with the full "♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥"? Weird!

Why does your name have red text?
Evil Crusader Aug 26, 2014 @ 12:19pm 
He is a Moderator for this game forum. That's why.
Last edited by Evil Crusader; Aug 26, 2014 @ 12:19pm
Showing 1-7 of 7 comments
< >
Per page: 15 30 50

Date Posted: Aug 25, 2014 @ 11:46pm
Posts: 7