Tomb Raider > General Discussions > Topic Details
╙Mλgíċaℓ Ήøﻇσ╜ Mar 30, 2013 @ 4:51pm
bite me for the people who can play this on the Ultimate settings.
and bite me alienware(another story)

ill be building a pc soon and be able to see my sexy lauras hair swoosh n the air like a boss

gr8 game for the 20min that i played so far
Showing 1-15 of 48 comments
< >
toiri Mar 30, 2013 @ 5:20pm 
i prefer the stock hair. the tressfx is a nice tech demo, but is incredibly distracting during gameplay. the standard hair seems more natural oddly enough.
kensaiD2591 Mar 30, 2013 @ 5:32pm 
If you're running an Nvidia card you're still going to struggle. My mate has a 680 and TressFX still goes super buggy on him due to Nvidia not getting a chance to see the code prior to release and the fact it's designed with AMD in mind.
OverlordTomala Mar 30, 2013 @ 5:32pm 
Just so you know, even the highest performing cards out on the market currently can barely make it past 30-40 FPS.

I have an HD 6950 and get an average of 36 FPS with tress FX enabled in ultimate mode. It's good to see something finally challenging good hardware. We'll finally see some reasonable upgrades in both hardware and gaming in general.
ErzaHD Mar 30, 2013 @ 5:43pm 
max stats with tressfx and every additional setting 50-90 fps
Raven In Red Mar 30, 2013 @ 5:56pm 
I havre an Alienware and the graphics have been more than phenomenal, and her hair is not an issue. Nor have any play issues been around. Crashed twice, but that's because my driver update ran interference.

Hey - how can I check my FPS? I've been curious since I've been playing this game because, like I said, the graphix are phenomenal.

~~Raven
Terror Mar 30, 2013 @ 6:39pm 
I didn't like TressFX, seemed unnatural and buggy and was distracting. I had to disable it
CM Dell Mar 30, 2013 @ 8:54pm 
7950 Crossfire, demolishes Tress-FX like it wasn't there.

Bite me
Vaginal Juice Milkshakes Mar 30, 2013 @ 9:23pm 
I run it on Ultra with tressfx no probs on a 7850 OC.
crossdx Mar 31, 2013 @ 12:50am 
Even 3-way SLI 680s only manage 80-90 fps average with everything maxed on 1920x1080. TressFX a bit flickery on initial loading, but livable.
CM Dell Mar 31, 2013 @ 11:07am 
SLI 680 is wasted at 1920x1080.
crossdx Mar 31, 2013 @ 12:46pm 
Originally posted by Dell | CL 2NE1:
SLI 680 is wasted at 1920x1080.
Not on a 120hz monitor.
CM Dell Mar 31, 2013 @ 2:50pm 
Try 2 120hz monitors.

Can you tell the difference between 120fps and 60fps? Don't think it's humanly possible lol. I use V-sync, pointless letting my radeons produce 100's of frames I can't see.
Arcticspyder Mar 31, 2013 @ 6:17pm 
Two 580 GTX's in SLI, ZERO PROBLEMS!
Vaginal Juice Milkshakes Mar 31, 2013 @ 6:26pm 
Originally posted by Dell | CL 2NE1:
Try 2 120hz monitors.

Can you tell the difference between 120fps and 60fps? Don't think it's humanly possible lol. I use V-sync, pointless letting my radeons produce 100's of frames I can't see.
It's possible and you are very much mistaken.
Childofrock Mar 31, 2013 @ 6:47pm 
It's medically impossible to physically see more than 60 fps. The human eye cannot do it. Look it up. However, the input (especially with a mouse) on something above 60 fps can be noticeable and therefore it can be interpreted by the brain as "seeing" more than 60 fps.
Showing 1-15 of 48 comments
< >
Per page: 15 30 50
Date Posted: Mar 30, 2013 @ 4:51pm
Posts: 48