Installer Steam
log på
|
sprog
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (traditionelt kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tjekkisk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (græsk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (hollandsk)
Norsk
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasilien)
Română (rumænsk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et oversættelsesproblem
EDIT:
http://i.imgur.com/x6IZjTt.jpg
One of the coronas didn't appear, while the other is weaker than it should be. Yup. Coronas are broken in posters too.
I believe they prefer to call them flares in Source, not sure about that though. In fact I'm not even completely sure I'm not mistaken in calling them coronas ;P
Can't say i've every come across it before outside of lens flare people have added in post.
Another thing to consider..try rendering a movie image sequence instead of a poster.. then pull your still from the sequence. Like R234 pointed out, certain things don't work when exporting posters for some reason. You can opt to only render a very small sequence so you only are rendering the portion you want to create the poster from.
By the way... what are your camera/render settings anyway? As in.. Depth of Field, motion blur, etc. We are beginning to discover that high DoF settings can cause particle systems to not draw correctly during the render. For instance, at 256 DoF samples my smoke_cloud particle systems are completely see through and they certainly don't look like that in SFM's viewport. When i lower the DoF samples to 128 it gets a little better, but still not quite what they look like in my viewport. So anyway I wouldn't be surprised if high DoF was messing with other things like lighting in addition to particle systems.
Thanks again