Tex 3. apr @ 12:20am
GA2 is on the menu guys!
Viser 1-15 av 32 kommentarer
< >
iiKA 3. apr @ 1:26am 
100% PvP
WormShoe 3. apr @ 12:26pm 
♥♥♥♥ YESS 100% PVP FINALLY
iShayne 8. jul @ 3:09pm 
Opprinnelig skrevet av iiKA:
100% PvP :rcry:

Umad? Finally no more PvE addicts shooting robots 24/7 who influence the queue times.
.iProxy³ 16. jul @ 11:50am 
Wonder how long it'd take Hi-Rez to abandon this one.
Tex 17. jul @ 1:30am 
Shut up. Don't give them ideas.
Polly wants a cracker 17. jul @ 2:37pm 
Will it be based on WoW like it's predecessor? The first mmo I mean.
Trolling aside, I want this one. Standing by to pre-order!
SoullessDreamer 20. jul @ 12:17pm 
Not everyone likes PvP. For me, there are no games with new ideas that keep PvP fresh. To me PvP has become very stagnant. Playing with friends is a newer experience as co-op has not been a part of the gaming community as long as deathmatch has. Maybe it's because I am old and have been around the bend with gaming. Not to say PvP should be taken out. Just that for me I will not even look at a game anymore if it's 'only' PvP or it's the game's only redeeming factor.

If Hi-Rez has shown us anything about the way they made GA, I expect that they will add PvE if enough people complain about it. Just as they changed everything upon release back when I bought this game in beta.
Sist redigert av SoullessDreamer; 20. jul @ 12:18pm
Tex 21. jul @ 1:29pm 
When GA was at it;s peak, it was only PVP. Period.
SoullessDreamer 21. jul @ 3:20pm 
To each his own, my man. To each his own.
Hawkish 22. jul @ 1:46pm 
Opprinnelig skrevet av iShayne:
Umad?

^ ?

Some people just would rather "shoot robots" than read, and put up with, some of the narrow minded chatter that goes on display in dealing with the majority of the pvp folk. I think Steady mentioned this, somewhere.
From a prior pvp guru, it would be nice to see a full pvp place for these pvp happy players to venture off to. ;)
Anticipating the rise of decent chat manners upon their departure. :P (if the shoe fits)


IAS: Would be great if they totally took out the pvp from GA, once GA2 is released, and expand on the storyline and more pve implementations. This, of course, with the hopes of the many coming true and hi-rez dev's get back on GA.


SoullessDreamer 22. jul @ 2:58pm 
I wouldn't mind if there was a happy middle ground, a 1/2 and 1/2 as it were. I would even play PvP.(just as I do in GA)

It's not the people that I dislike in PvP it's just PvP is not as interesting anymore as it was back in Doom, Unreal 1, Quake, ara. Again this is my opinion. At least with PvE it holds my interest longer than PvP does. Now with having both, my interest is kept even longer. Giving a game more life.

I guess the oddest thing is why a company, who is out to make money, would not try to maximize it's product by appeasing a wider customer base? Give people the choice. You don't like PvE, don't play it. You don't like PvP, don't play it. You like them both, play them both. To take out one will limit the amount of money that this product produces making it's lifespan shorter in the end.
Tex 23. jul @ 1:43am 
If you don't like pvp, you are doing it wrong.
There are tons of PVE MMOs out there. If you think that PVE is nice in here, you have no ideea of how it is in other games.

In GA you don't have the flexibility or many tactics to enhance your PVE experience compared to other PVE MMOS. That is why PVE should not be primary focus of the game (if you ask me, it sould not exist).

GA at it's release was an awesome PVP experience. PVE din't exist. They distroyed the AVA original concept, players started to quit the game, so they tried to revive the game with PVE. And here where it went... it;s a ghost town, not a MMO. If you want to play solo, there are tons of offline solo RPGs out there.
SoullessDreamer 23. jul @ 9:02am 
I am not trying to offend you with this but that is your opinion. Not everyone thinks like you. I am not saying your opinion is wrong. I am not saying their opinion is wrong. However to say someone else's opinion is wrong over yours makes you wrong. So if someone doesn't like the PvP that's their opinion. They can't be 'wrong' for that. They can differ from your opinion, but they can't be wrong for it.

Also PvE was always in GA. I have been with them since closed beta back when the game cost you $60. To say PvE was never in GA, 'is' wrong. Again I am not trying to be offencive. I have just been here from the beginning. Now if you mean the open world stuff, yes that was added later. The mission PvE has always been in the game.

From the start, my agency and I has played more PvE than PvP. Again its more interesting than PvP 'to us'. Not that we don't play PvP, we just like having them both. Again I will state, to cut off the PvE players cuts the game's potential to make more money. Therefore making the game's lifespan not as long compared to if the devs make an accommodation for both sides. If you want GA and GA2 to become populated then wouldn't you want all players? Even if they like PvE, they might play PvP right?

Again I am not trying to be offencive. It's ok to not like PvE, but to say other's are wrong for liking the PvE GA offers will not get others to share your opinion. In fact most will look at these comments and see nothing but a fool. I am not saying you are a fool, I don't know you personally. I am just letting you know how you are coming across. I just would want someone to tell me the same thing if I was being offencive.
Polly wants a cracker 23. jul @ 11:21am 
Opprinnelig skrevet av SoullessDreamer:
I am not trying to offend you with this but that is your opinion. Not everyone thinks like you. I am not saying your opinion is wrong. I am not saying their opinion is wrong. However to say someone else's opinion is wrong over yours makes you wrong. So if someone doesn't like the PvP that's their opinion. They can't be 'wrong' for that. They can differ from your opinion, but they can't be wrong for it.

Also PvE was always in GA. I have been with them since closed beta back when the game cost you $60. To say PvE was never in GA, 'is' wrong. Again I am not trying to be offencive. I have just been here from the beginning. Now if you mean the open world stuff, yes that was added later. The mission PvE has always been in the game.

From the start, my agency and I has played more PvE than PvP. Again its more interesting than PvP 'to us'. Not that we don't play PvP, we just like having them both. Again I will state, to cut off the PvE players cuts the game's potential to make more money. Therefore making the game's lifespan not as long compared to if the devs make an accommodation for both sides. If you want GA and GA2 to become populated then wouldn't you want all players? Even if they like PvE, they might play PvP right?

Again I am not trying to be offencive. It's ok to not like PvE, but to say other's are wrong for liking the PvE GA offers will not get others to share your opinion. In fact most will look at these comments and see nothing but a fool. I am not saying you are a fool, I don't know you personally. I am just letting you know how you are coming across. I just would want someone to tell me the same thing if I was being offencive.
So you make this poor attempt at making it seem as though you are taking a high road, only to get away with calling this person a fool for preferring PvP?
Secondly, a PvP game can be just as successful even without a PvE component. Or are you saying no one is playing CS or TF2?

I think the main issue with having a PvE component is like you're saying it yourself; "Even if they like PvE, they might play PvP right?". Fact is that most PvP players don't want people who don't like or care about PvP on their teams when they're trying to win.
Sist redigert av Polly wants a cracker; 23. jul @ 11:23am
SoullessDreamer 23. jul @ 11:51am 
There was no high road, there was no road. Just a conversation between two adults. I never called him a fool. Just stating that how he was coming across. By saying that other's opinions are wrong if they do not align with his. By stating this he will loose their attention, start a fight or just look foolish.

To give an example: "most PvP players don't want people who don't like or care about PvP on their teams when they're trying to win." is your opinion. I am not saying you are wrong, just that I don't agree with you. I don't mind a good debate, I am greek. We love to debate. However I would never say you are wrong in an opinion. Everyone's personal experiences are different. So what you like and/or perceive might be different from my own experiences. There is no reason we can't both agree in facts and disagree in opinions, no?
Sist redigert av SoullessDreamer; 23. jul @ 12:00pm
Viser 1-15 av 32 kommentarer
< >
Per side: 15 30 50