Arma 3 > Discussões Gerais > Detalhes do tópico
Dwarden  [autor] 13 Set, 2013 às 6:32
News: [DEV branch update on Monday] : + more
ok, as some of you may know the DEV branch gets update at monday (if all goes well)

what some may not know is that DEV branch is now reverted to stable branch which means it's 2-3 weeks backward on fixes ...

and as we fixed already quite bugs and performance issues
(and added some more optimizing (again subtle not superlatives))

then there will be leap ahead of actual 1.0 stable branch ...

i'm definitely quite sorry for this not being already published today ...

so ... now ... i shall go find some shelter ... i hear incoming heavy barrage ...

+++
Our intention is to keep building upon the foundation of Arma 3 in the coming years - similar to how we did it for Arma 2. As with any of the previous games in the series, this launch is just the beginning

So instead, what we are going to do will be similar to Arma 1:
we are going to release the entire Arma 2 library to the community
and allow them create any derivative work within Arma 3.
More details will be announced very soon. ...

read more:
http://www.arma3.com/news/report-in-marek-spanel-ceo#.UjM2yCk9LmG
Última alteração por Dwarden; 13 Set, 2013 às 9:22
A mostrar 1-15 de 161 comentários
< >
I am a GTX 670 13 Set, 2013 às 6:32 
Dude you guys are doing fine. ARMA OA and ARMA 3 player. The Engine is fine. I am running a FX 8350 along with a single GTX 670 and 8 gigs of ram and i am able to push it to 60-70 (120 hz monitor owner) fps on max with 2600 view distance on both atlis and Stratis. Dont beat yourself up most of these people are running procs and GPU's with out of date arc design.
Última alteração por I am a GTX 670; 13 Set, 2013 às 6:34
Lafferty 13 Set, 2013 às 6:39 

Originalmente postado por I AM NOT SLIM SHADY:
Dude you guys are doing fine. ARMA OA and ARMA 3 player. The Engine is fine. I am running a FX 8350 along with a single GTX 670 and 8 gigs of ram and i am able to push it to 60-70 (120 hz monitor owner) fps on max with 2600 view distance on both atlis and Stratis. Dont beat yourself up most of these people are running procs and GPU's with out of date arc design.

You are in no way getting that performance on those specs my friend unless you aint in no fire fight in which case its believeable only in single player never multplayer maxed out!. I have a far greater spec gaming pc than you and i achieve that fps rating on overclocked i7 3770K and a ASUS GTX TITAN! during multiplayer matches with some tweaked settings.

Multiplayer issies are ones which are common in any game of this nature and if no one comprehends this then im sorry but thats your personally downfall. You can not compare this game to others because ofthe sheer amount of resources it has to display at any given time not to to mention server hardware, connection speeds, mission optimization and a tonne of other stuff.

I7 3770k 4.7ghz
Asus GTX titan x2
G.Skill TridentX 32GB 2400MHz
Samsung 240GB SSD (win8)
Corsair 120GB SSD (Arma3 + Romee)
2 x 1TB Black Caviar
Water Cooled (cpu) + Air Cooled
Última alteração por Lafferty; 13 Set, 2013 às 6:42
I am a GTX 670 13 Set, 2013 às 6:42 
Originalmente postado por ColinLafferty:
Originalmente postado por I AM NOT SLIM SHADY:
Dude you guys are doing fine. ARMA OA and ARMA 3 player. The Engine is fine. I am running a FX 8350 along with a single GTX 670 and 8 gigs of ram and i am able to push it to 60-70 (120 hz monitor owner) fps on max with 2600 view distance on both atlis and Stratis. Dont beat yourself up most of these people are running procs and GPU's with out of date arc design.

You are in no way getting that performance on those sepcs my friend. Show me a video and not a screenshot and i will believe you even in single player you want get this. I have a far greater spec gaming pc than you and i achieve that fps rating on overclocked i7 3770K and a ASUS GTX TITAN!.

Multiplayer issies are ones which are common in any game of this nature and if no one comprehends this then im sorry but thats your personally downfall. You can not compare this game to others because ofthe sheer amount of resources it has to display at any given time not to to mention server hardware, connection speeds, mission optimization and a tonne of other stuff.

I am because the game is not that intensive if you know how to config it correctly. Also the FX 8350 provides the multi-core performance i need when playing ARMA 3. The Titan is overpowered as ♥♥♥♥ but this game is more CPU intensive than GPU intensive hence why i can get the FPS i can get. Drop 200-300 guys in the editor with me, itll drop to 40-50 fps.

I was talking singleplayer. I hold a solid 30 fps on multiplayer at 2300 view distance. Multiplayer was always buggy due to the Servers not being Bohemia owned. Your titan's and I7 should on singleplayer from a performance standpoint max the game with over 300-800 guys.

FX 8350 clocked at 4.2 ghz 8 cores unlocked.
EVGA GTX 670 2.5gb V-ram.
8 gigs kingston hyperX 1600mhz
H100i cooler
M5A88-EVO motherboard.

Última alteração por I am a GTX 670; 13 Set, 2013 às 6:44
Kelt 13 Set, 2013 às 6:43 
Originalmente postado por I AM NOT SLIM SHADY:
I am because the game is not that intensive if you know how to config it correctly. Also the FX 8350 provides the multi-core performance i need when playing ARMA 3. The Titan is overpowered as ♥♥♥♥ but this game is more CPU intensive than GPU intensive hence why i can get the FPS i can get. Drop 200-300 guys in the editor with me, itll drop to 40-50 fps.

Yeah yeah, keep living in your own world.

ps.
Try to join MP.
I am a GTX 670 13 Set, 2013 às 6:45 
Originalmente postado por Kelt:
Originalmente postado por I AM NOT SLIM SHADY:
I am because the game is not that intensive if you know how to config it correctly. Also the FX 8350 provides the multi-core performance i need when playing ARMA 3. The Titan is overpowered as ♥♥♥♥ but this game is more CPU intensive than GPU intensive hence why i can get the FPS i can get. Drop 200-300 guys in the editor with me, itll drop to 40-50 fps.

Yeah yeah, keep living in your own world.

ps.
Try to join MP.

I have foolish one, read again i said i get 30 fps solid with 2300 view distance. Its the singleplayer that has no issues, the game hardly takes any CPU power until you drop AI onto the map unless you're running a Yorkfield arch CPU.

To get better FPS on multiplayer the Servers need to be of better quality. Most of em are homemade servers running on internet beyond too slow to support a mil sim such as ARMA 3. Hell id need at least a 8000$ server to make ARMA 3 give a proper FPS and even then i can only gurantee 20 players max can have that (otherwise im pushing the server too hard)
Última alteração por I am a GTX 670; 13 Set, 2013 às 6:46
Lafferty 13 Set, 2013 às 6:47 
How much vram has your card got exactly its no way in the league of my card so it cant push as many textures around as you believe and i have 2. The cpu doesnt handle textures or am i mistaken ? do you know more than all of use logical people. The onl;y way this happens is if the settings are to low and you arent offloading to the gpu which you should be in the first place. Arma is cpu intensive only when there is calculation to be made such as ai, pathfinding and whatever else. So yes you would experience a huge fps drop because the cpu is working its ♥♥♥ of as it should be rather than sitting idle when nothing is happening so to speak.

Also if you havent notice which quiet clearly you havent almost every single multiplayer server resets EVERYONES view distance to 1600m by default. You need to mouse scroll and change this to have any effect as this overides all your personal settings. IF you dont believe me join a server mouse scroll and see the option either view distance settings or settings!. So you are playing at low view distance like everyone else and just getting a solid 30fps.

Also i have one high spec server and fibre optic 100MB (actual line speed @ 82mb) dedicated to arma 3 alone. I have tested and guess what the results are the damn same with very minute improvements over ever other server!.

i7 2600 @ 4.5GHZ
SAPPHIRE AMD Radeon HD 7850 Dual-X 2GB GDDR5
8GB 1600mhz
1tb blue barricuda
Última alteração por Lafferty; 13 Set, 2013 às 6:55
I am a GTX 670 13 Set, 2013 às 6:52 
Originalmente postado por ColinLafferty:
How much vram has your card got exactly its no way in the league of my card so it cant push as many textures around as you believe and i have 2. The cpu doesnt handle textures or am i mistaken ? do you know more than all of use logical people. The onl;y way this happens is if the settings are to low and you arent offloading to the gpu which you should be in the first place. Arma is cpu intensive only when there is calculation to be made such as ai, pathfinding and whatever else. So yes you would experience a huge fps drop because the cpu is working its ♥♥♥ of as it should be rather than sitting idle when nothing is happening so to speak.

Also if you havent notice which quiet clearly you havent almost every single multiplayer server resets EVERYONES view distance to 1600m by default. You need to mouse scroll and change this to have any effect as this overides all your personal settings. IF you dont believe me join a server mouse scroll and see the option either view distance settings or settings!. So you are playing at low view distance like everyone else and just getting a solid 30fps.

*face palm* i run it at max, with X2 AA, X16 anti stropic, Shadows in medium, view distance set to 2600 for single player and 2300 for multiplayer(the ones that allow the change). On single i easily achieve with no AI in the map 60-70 fps, drop a few hundred AI i go down to 40-50 fps. On multiplayer i barely hold 30-35 fps thanks to the servers.

I am not pushing my hardware to the max, hence why i am able to achieve my frame-rates. Most people are pushing Ultra on hardware incapable of doing it.

CPU handles the AI, the physics, and just about anything needing extremely fast calculations which is quite intensive considering ARMA 3 is all real time and the island does not delete itself in Cell's as other games do so performance will take a bad hit because of this. ARMA OA suffered the same fate on release, people couldnt run it well due to out of date CPU's and GPU's. I had to upgrade my FX 8120 to this FX 8350 to achieve better performance overall through ARMA 3 as the 8120 was not cutting it

I wonder if the Titan is worth it these days. The GTX 670 is showing its age when you add too much tesselation into the picture.
Última alteração por I am a GTX 670; 13 Set, 2013 às 6:58
little-tats 13 Set, 2013 às 7:40 
Dude you guys are doing fine. ARMA OA and ARMA 3 player. The Engine is fine. I am running a FX 8350 along with a single GTX 670 and 8 gigs of ram and i am able to push it to 60-70 (120 hz monitor owner) fps on max with 2600 view distance on both atlis and Stratis. Dont beat yourself up most of these people are running procs and GPU's with out of date arc design.

FX 8350 @ 4.5 GHZ
GTX 660TI
8 GB G-skill RAM.

maybe 50 FPS at

terrain--low
view distance 1500
object distance 1250
AA- 0
textures very high
objects very high
shadows low
post processing low
I'm playing it I believe at an average level in regards to graphics..

This guy has no damn clue what he is talking about.
oxmox 13 Set, 2013 às 7:41 
A graphic card for 1000 Euro is never worth it, since such a card will loose the value quiete fast.
Dwarden  [autor] 13 Set, 2013 às 9:15 
1st post updated with some great news :) ... and yes we're the baddies :)))))))
Kara Kurt 13 Set, 2013 às 9:39 
Can someone make a conclusion of what does it says about Arma 3, please?
Dwarden  [autor] 13 Set, 2013 às 9:39 
i picked the two most important lines , aren't they enough ?
Kwelduvel 13 Set, 2013 às 9:39 
Originalmente postado por Buli:
Can someone make a conclusion of what does it says about Arma 3, please?
What I understand is the following: "do it yourself, community".
I am a GTX 670 13 Set, 2013 às 9:42 
Originalmente postado por supertoad1:
Dude you guys are doing fine. ARMA OA and ARMA 3 player. The Engine is fine. I am running a FX 8350 along with a single GTX 670 and 8 gigs of ram and i am able to push it to 60-70 (120 hz monitor owner) fps on max with 2600 view distance on both atlis and Stratis. Dont beat yourself up most of these people are running procs and GPU's with out of date arc design.

FX 8350 @ 4.5 GHZ
GTX 660TI
8 GB G-skill RAM.

maybe 50 FPS at

terrain--low
view distance 1500
object distance 1250
AA- 0
textures very high
objects very high
shadows low
post processing low
I'm playing it I believe at an average level in regards to graphics..

This guy has no damn clue what he is talking about.

You're using a 660ti and you're telling me i have no idea what im talking about? You're also using Gskill ram..... great job looking foolish my friend. Your rig must be sick mine is running it practically maxed out aside from shadows and view distance. Unlike yourself i can gurantee you're overheating the CPU. Fun fact my GPU has 33% more performance over yours when it comes to Mpixels/sec. I also have more memory bandwidth than you do around 34%
Última alteração por I am a GTX 670; 13 Set, 2013 às 9:45
atrOx 13 Set, 2013 às 10:00 
The game cant use the grafic card properly! it uses 20-30% of the grafic card it seems to.
My card GTX Titan is silent as hell so it cant be used. Something is very wrong, need to get drivers from nvidia and amd and more support from dev on fixing framerate issue. PRIO 1 otherwise the game isnt playable, destroys the gameplay totaly!!

EDIT : Please fix the framerate issue and the game will rock the ♥♥♥♥ out of you!
Última alteração por atrOx; 13 Set, 2013 às 10:02
A mostrar 1-15 de 161 comentários
< >
Por página: 15 30 50
Postado a: 13 Set, 2013 às 6:32
Comentários: 161